1980
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2797(80)90153-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and repair of O6-methylguanine in different fractions of rat liver DNA after dimethylnitrosamine administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When rodent cells treated with the alkylating agent dimethylsulfate (DMS) are analyzed for preferential DNA repair, no significant difference was observed between transcribed and nontranscribed genetic regions (Scicchitano and Hanawalt, 1990). This is in agreement with other studies showing that there was little difference in the repair of alkali-sensitive sites in collagen I and ␤-globin genes of N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)-treated confluent human cells, and that Nmethylpurines are removed uniformly from rat liver chromatin (Galbraith et al, 1980;Ryan et al, 1986). Overall, the weight of evidence supports the idea that bulky DNA damage, which can block transcription and replication, is repaired preferentially by TCR, whereas small base modifications, such as those produced by monofunctional DNA alkylating agents, are removed from active and inactive genes at similar rates.…”
Section: Nucleotide Excision Repair and Base Excision Repairsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…When rodent cells treated with the alkylating agent dimethylsulfate (DMS) are analyzed for preferential DNA repair, no significant difference was observed between transcribed and nontranscribed genetic regions (Scicchitano and Hanawalt, 1990). This is in agreement with other studies showing that there was little difference in the repair of alkali-sensitive sites in collagen I and ␤-globin genes of N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG)-treated confluent human cells, and that Nmethylpurines are removed uniformly from rat liver chromatin (Galbraith et al, 1980;Ryan et al, 1986). Overall, the weight of evidence supports the idea that bulky DNA damage, which can block transcription and replication, is repaired preferentially by TCR, whereas small base modifications, such as those produced by monofunctional DNA alkylating agents, are removed from active and inactive genes at similar rates.…”
Section: Nucleotide Excision Repair and Base Excision Repairsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While Galbraith et al (16) observed no differences in the methylation or repair at the 06 position of guanine in various fractions, Ryan et al (17) reported a significantly higher rate of removal of 06-methylguanine in active regions of chromatin. They also reported that removal of Nmethylpurines, unlike 06-methylguanine, was the same in the different fractions of chromatin they studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%