2009
DOI: 10.1002/ajp.20690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distribution and abundance of sacred monkeys in Igboland, southern Nigeria

Abstract: Although primates are hunted on a global scale, some species are protected against harassment and killing by taboos or religious doctrines. Sites where the killing of sacred monkeys or the destruction of sacred groves is forbidden may be integral to the conservation of certain species. In 2004, as part of a distribution survey of Sclater's guenon (Cercopithecus sclateri) in southern Nigeria, we investigated reports of sacred monkeys in the Igbo-speaking region of Nigeria. We confirmed nine new sites where prim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this outcome is based on a relatively small number of detections, it is supported by previous observations at other sites where Sclater's monkey persists in densely inhabited village environments because of local taboos that prevent it from being hunted (Oates et al 1992;Tooze 1995;Baker et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this outcome is based on a relatively small number of detections, it is supported by previous observations at other sites where Sclater's monkey persists in densely inhabited village environments because of local taboos that prevent it from being hunted (Oates et al 1992;Tooze 1995;Baker et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…By limiting variation to 0 or 1 group/plot, we also eliminated the confounding effect that abundance can have on detection (i.e., the probability of detecting at least one group increases in plots with C2 groups) (Royle and Nichols 2003). Although we recognized that group sizes can vary substantially and that such variation can affect detection, previous observations of this species throughout its range, including this study site, indicated that average group sizes were usually small (*10 individuals) (Baker et al 2009; L. Baker, personal observation).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Literature entries reporting precise locality data, recorded in 2005-2015, were also used (e.g., Baker and Olubode 2008;Baker et al 2009;Pimley 2009; Colyn et al Ikemeh 2007aIkemeh , b, 2013Akani et al 2014aAkani et al , b, c, 2015Petrozzi et al 2015). Although published after 2005, Blench (2007) was not considered as a source for current data (2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015) because (1) most of this author's records came from Powell (1993), and (2) Blench did not explicitly distinguish between his own original/recent records and those drawn from Powell (1993).…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, this region has been carefully explored for primate ecological research since the 1960s (e.g., Oates and Jewell 1967;Jewell and Oates 1969;Oates 1985Oates , 1999Anadu and Oates 1988;Werre 1991;Oates et al 2004;Baker et al 2009), and during the last 20 years also for the ecology of reptiles (e.g., Akani et al 1999;2008;Luiselli 2008) and amphibians (e.g., Akani et al 2004;2014a;. However, the ecology of some groups of animals was least studied, for instance that of non-primate large and medium sized mammals (e.g., Happold 1987;Powell 1993Powell , 1997Angelici et al 1999;Petrozzi et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research assistants counted the number of individuals in the group to which they were assigned, assessed age-sex class composition every hour during the 5 h that they stayed with the group, and noted whether the count was a 'good' count or not. A 'good' count was characterized by the fact that the group either crossed an open area during counting, or was in a tree with good visibility [Baker et al, 2009]. Research assistants were rotated between groups and between fragments on a daily basis to get distinct counts and minimize biases in the counts.…”
Section: Vellerosus Population Censusmentioning
confidence: 99%