Distributed Water Pollution Source Localization with Mobile UV-Visible Spectrometer Probes in Wireless Sensor Networks

In December 2016, the wastewater treatment plant of Baarle-Nassau, Netherlands, failed. The failure was caused by the illegal disposal of high volumes of acidic waste into the sewer network. Repairs cost between 80,000 and 100,000 EUR. A continuous monitoring system of a utility network such as this one would help to determine the causes of such pollution and could mitigate or reduce the impact of these kinds of events in the future. We have designed and tested a data fusion system that transforms the time-series of sensor measurements into an array of source-localized discharge events. The data fusion system performs this transformation as follows. First, the time-series of sensor measurements are resampled and converted to sensor observations in a unified discrete time domain. Second, sensor observations are mapped to pollutant detections that indicate the amount of specific pollutants according to a priori knowledge. Third, pollutant detections are used for inferring the propagation of the discharged pollutant downstream of the sewage network to account for missing sensor observations. Fourth, pollutant detections and inferred sensor observations are clustered to form tracks. Finally, tracks are processed and propagated upstream to form the final list of probable events. A set of experiments was performed using a modified variant of the EPANET Example Network 2. Results of our experiments show that the proposed system can narrow down the source of pollution to seven or fewer nodes, depending on the number of sensors, while processing approximately 100 sensor observations per second. Having considered the results, such a system could provide meaningful information about pollution events in utility networks.

Section: Past Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Pollution Source Localization in Wastewater Networks

Chachuła

Nowak

Solano

2021

“…Researchers’ interest in exploring methods for the detection, localization, and quantification of pollutants in wastewater networks (WWNs) and water distribution systems (WDSs) has grown considerably in recent years, especially regarding sensor technology [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Questionable policies regarding waste disposal are prevalent in today’s industry [ 17 , 18 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multisensor Data Fusion for Localization of Pollution Sources in Wastewater Networks

Chachuła

Słojewski

Nowak

2022

Illegal discharges of pollutants into sewage networks are a growing problem in large European cities. Such events often require restarting wastewater treatment plants, which cost up to a hundred thousand Euros. A system for localization and quantification of pollutants in utility networks could discourage such behavior and indicate a culprit if it happens. We propose an enhanced algorithm for multisensor data fusion for the detection, localization, and quantification of pollutants in wastewater networks. The algorithm processes data from multiple heterogeneous sensors in real-time, producing current estimates of network state and alarms if one or many sensors detect pollutants. Our algorithm models the network as a directed acyclic graph, uses adaptive peak detection, estimates the amount of specific compounds, and tracks the pollutant using a Kalman filter. We performed numerical experiments for several real and artificial sewage networks, and measured the quality of discharge event reconstruction. We report the correctness and performance of our system. We also propose a method to assess the importance of specific sensor locations. The experiments show that the algorithm’s success rate is equal to sensor coverage of the network. Moreover, the median distance between nodes pointed out by the fusion algorithm and nodes where the discharge was introduced equals zero when more than half of the network nodes contain sensors. The system can process around 5000 measurements per second, using 1 MiB of memory per 4600 measurements plus a constant of 97 MiB, and it can process 20 tracks per second, using 1.3 MiB of memory per 100 tracks.

“…In recent years, several sensor prototypes for monitoring wastewater composition at points that are further from the WWTP [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ] have been proposed and studied. These sensors (electrochemical sensors, optical sensors, mass spectrometry, ion spectrometry, etc.)…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying and Estimating the Location of Sources of Industrial Pollution in the Sewage Network

Buras

Solano

2021

Harsh pollutants that are illegally disposed in the sewer network may spread beyond the sewer network—e.g., through leakages leading to groundwater reservoirs—and may also impair the correct operation of wastewater treatment plants. Consequently, such pollutants pose serious threats to water bodies, to the natural environment and, therefore, to all life. In this article, we focus on the problem of identifying a wastewater pollutant and localizing its source point in the wastewater network, given a time-series of wastewater measurements collected by sensors positioned across the sewer network. We provide a solution to the problem by solving two linked sub-problems. The first sub-problem concerns the detection and identification of the flowing pollutants in wastewater, i.e., assessing whether a given time-series corresponds to a contamination event and determining what the polluting substance caused it. This problem is solved using random forest classifiers. The second sub-problem relates to the estimation of the distance between the point of measurement and the pollutant source, when considering the outcome of substance identification sub-problem. The XGBoost algorithm is used to predict the distance from the source to the sensor. Both of the models are trained using simulated electrical conductivity and pH measurements of wastewater in sewers of a european city sub-catchment area. Our experiments show that: (a) resulting precision and recall values of the solution to the identification sub-problem can be both as high as 96%, and that (b) the median of the error that is obtained for the estimation of the source location sub-problem can be as low as 6.30 m.