2015
DOI: 10.1002/2015gl065806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed subglacial discharge drives significant submarine melt at a Greenland tidewater glacier

Abstract: Submarine melt can account for substantial mass loss at tidewater glacier termini. However, the processes controlling submarine melt are poorly understood due to limited observations of submarine termini. Here at a tidewater glacier in central West Greenland, we identify subglacial discharge outlets and infer submarine melt across the terminus using direct observations of the submarine terminus face. We find extensive melting associated with small discharge outlets. While the majority of discharge is routed to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
206
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(58 reference statements)
17
206
3
Order By: Relevance
“…8d) creates an undercut profile concentrated right near the waterline. Fried et al (2015) found similar results when modelling melt rates at shallow grounding lines (100-250 m) given 250 m 3 s −1 discharge. It is interesting to see that the observed front after calving, F obs i (dashed line in Fig.…”
Section: Undercuttingsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…8d) creates an undercut profile concentrated right near the waterline. Fried et al (2015) found similar results when modelling melt rates at shallow grounding lines (100-250 m) given 250 m 3 s −1 discharge. It is interesting to see that the observed front after calving, F obs i (dashed line in Fig.…”
Section: Undercuttingsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…First, we analyse the sensitivity of the model to different constant (in space and time) B ref values applied at the base of the ice-sheet marine margins. Due to the scarcity of submarine melt observations along the GrIS coasts, and since the only available estimates have focused on few very rapid tidewater Greenland glaciers that cannot be representative of the basal melt rate for the entirety of GrIS marine areas (Rignot et al, 2010;Motyka et al, 2011;Straneo et al, 2012;Xu et al, 2013;Enderlin and Howat, 2013;Fried et al, 2015;Rignot et al, 2016;Wilson et al, 2017), we assume presentday basal melting rates for Greenland comparable to those from Antarctic ice shelves . The range of values of B ref is set between 0 and 40 m a −1 , while κ is set to zero to make the ocean contribution constant in time.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, more comprehensive mooring arrays, perhaps coupled with new methods for estimating submarine melting (e.g. from imaging of glacier fronts, Rignot et al, 2015;Fried et al, 2015), could provide a path forward for better constraining the freshwater fluxes. Additionally, icebergs might be a significant source of submarine melting in fjords, obscuring the glacier melt-rate and requiring new methods to partition glacier and iceberg melting if glacier melt rates are to be estimated from oceanic measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the measurements from Fried et al (2015) show terminus undercutting due to submarine melting, which has been suggested to enhance calving Bartholomaus et al, 2013) and thus present a mechanism for submarine melting to trigger dynamic glacier changes.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation