2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed robust estimation over randomly switching networks using H consensus

Abstract: The paper considers a distributed robust estimation problem over a network with Markovian randomly varying topology. The objective is to deal with network variations locally, by switching observer gains at affected nodes only. We propose sufficient conditions which guarantee a suboptimal H∞ level of relative disagreement of estimates in such observer networks. When the status of the network is known globally, these sufficient conditions enable the network gains to be computed by solving certain LMIs. When the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
109
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Carli et al (2008), it is proven for a very simple system that when the number of iterations of the consensus steps is finite, the optimal gain differs from the one computed assuming that the consensus is reached. Consensus is also used in the works of Ugrinovskii (see Ugrinovskii (2011), Ugrinovskii (2013), and Wu et al (2015)), in which the author proposes iterative, distributed LMI-based designs of H ∞ filters, and in Acikmese et al (2014), where the consensus and the measurement processes work at different rates. A similar framework is used in Shen et al (2010) for the case of possible data dropouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Carli et al (2008), it is proven for a very simple system that when the number of iterations of the consensus steps is finite, the optimal gain differs from the one computed assuming that the consensus is reached. Consensus is also used in the works of Ugrinovskii (see Ugrinovskii (2011), Ugrinovskii (2013), and Wu et al (2015)), in which the author proposes iterative, distributed LMI-based designs of H ∞ filters, and in Acikmese et al (2014), where the consensus and the measurement processes work at different rates. A similar framework is used in Shen et al (2010) for the case of possible data dropouts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ugrinovskii([15]) studied distributed robust filter problem for continuous-time target and proposed a sufficient H ∞ filtering condition by solv- ing a convex optimization/feasibility problem subject to LMI constraints. In [16] he extended the results to a network with Markovian randomly varying topology and switching gains, and gave sufficient conditions enable the network gains to be computed by solving certain LMIs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One is LMI-based and the other is given by the eigenvalues of the process matrix and Laplacian matrices. In the above listed work on consensusbased observers ( [11]- [16]), the role of the interconnection graph was often hidden behind the design conditions. The proposed conditions in this paper are tightly related to the eigenvalues of the graph Laplacian matrices, and their computations are not increasing with the number of sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, H ∞ filtering provides an alternative way to guarantee certain prescribed H ∞ performance in the design of the distributed filtering. Some initial efforts have been made on H ∞ filtering problem for a variety of systems, such as fuzzy systems [11], stochastic systems [4], switching systems [12], time-varying systems [13], and nonlinear systems [14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%