2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0661(01)00159-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed quantitative and qualitative fault diagnosis: railway junction case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following successful implementation on a level crossing mechanism (Roberts 2002) [23], the authors adapted the methods to detect faults in seven point machines at Abbotswood junction, shown in Fig. 6 as boxes 638, 639, 640, 641A, 641B, 642A and 642B.…”
Section: Device and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following successful implementation on a level crossing mechanism (Roberts 2002) [23], the authors adapted the methods to detect faults in seven point machines at Abbotswood junction, shown in Fig. 6 as boxes 638, 639, 640, 641A, 641B, 642A and 642B.…”
Section: Device and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are essentially two opposing attitudes for diagnosis system [22] and [27]. First one is corrective maintenance or diagnosis after the failure, second one is the preventive maintenance [28] or diagnosis before the failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…points, signals) is a vital issue due to its harsh results. Therefore, fault diagnosis and condition monitoring studies on railway point mechanisms can be found in the literature (Rouvray et al 1998;Roberts et al 2002;Garcia Marquez et al 2003;Zattoni 2006). However, these studies are addressed the fault diagnosis problem from a different perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%