2018
DOI: 10.3390/s18051480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Power Allocation for Wireless Sensor Network Localization: A Potential Game Approach

Abstract: The problem of distributed power allocation in wireless sensor network (WSN) localization systems is investigated in this paper, using the game theoretic approach. Existing research focuses on the minimization of the localization errors of individual agent nodes over all anchor nodes subject to power budgets. When the service area and the distribution of target nodes are considered, finding the optimal trade-off between localization accuracy and power consumption is a new critical task. To cope with this issue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nature quality of Potential Game (PG): the motivation of all players to change their strategies can be expressed as a global function [33], which could exactly meet this need. Some studies have applied the potential game to solve the spatial spectrum access problem [34] and power allocation problem [35]. We can also find this game method widely used in resource allocation, especially cooperating with other methods in some complex situations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature quality of Potential Game (PG): the motivation of all players to change their strategies can be expressed as a global function [33], which could exactly meet this need. Some studies have applied the potential game to solve the spatial spectrum access problem [34] and power allocation problem [35]. We can also find this game method widely used in resource allocation, especially cooperating with other methods in some complex situations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select the most informative agent‐agent links, the benefit from the coalition can be employed by the localisation accuracy and the cost can be reflected by the number of links. Therefore, similar with [33, 34], the objective of each coalition is to minimise the SPEB of each agent node penalised by the number of links in the coalition. Based on above information, we define the utility function of each coalition as truerightUfalse(kfalse)=true{Pmfalse(kfalse)+nCmPnfalse(kfalse)true}β·true{Lmfalse(kfalse)+nCmLnfalse(kfalse)true}.The first term in the right side characterises the localisation information of agent nodes in the coalition, which represents the benefit of agent node m obtained from the coalition Cm.…”
Section: Cooperative Approaches and Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To select the most informative agent-agent links, the benefit from the coalition can be employed by the localisation accuracy and the cost can be reflected by the number of links. Therefore, similar with [33,34], the objective of each coalition is to minimise the SPEB of each agent node penalised by the number of links in the coalition. Based on above information, we define the utility function of each coalition as…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%