2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12555-019-9216-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed-observer-based Fault Tolerant Control Design for Nonlinear Multi-agent Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the MASs (5) and ( 6). Given scalars 𝛾 1 > 0, 𝜀 > 0, 𝜆 1 > 0, then there exists an adaptive fault estimation observer (11)-( 13) such that the observer error system (16) satisfies the H ∞ performance, and the observer gain matrix R = P −1 Y , if there exist matrices P > 0, Y , F 1 and F 2 with proper dimensions, such that inequalities (17) and ( 18) hold…”
Section: Adaptive Fault Estimation Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consider the MASs (5) and ( 6). Given scalars 𝛾 1 > 0, 𝜀 > 0, 𝜆 1 > 0, then there exists an adaptive fault estimation observer (11)-( 13) such that the observer error system (16) satisfies the H ∞ performance, and the observer gain matrix R = P −1 Y , if there exist matrices P > 0, Y , F 1 and F 2 with proper dimensions, such that inequalities (17) and ( 18) hold…”
Section: Adaptive Fault Estimation Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…▪ Remark 1. Note that it is difficult to handle inequalities (17) and (18) which are nonconvex because of the terms of P, P −1 , 𝜀 and 𝜀 −1 . To solve this problem, the nonlinear optimization method based on the cone complementary linearization algorithm is introduced.…”
Section: Adaptive Fault Estimation Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to the conventional maneuver, the airflow attached to the surface of the aircraft is in the form of attached flow, swirling flow, swirl broken and separated flow in turn during the PSPM (Lyu et al , 2017), which leads to serious unsteady aerodynamic disturbances (UADs) and further affects the robustness of the PSPM system. To enhance the robustness, some methods, such as neural network (NN) (Gong et al , 2020; Ullah et al , 2022), sliding mode control (Mosalsal and Khodabandeh, 2022; Cheng et al , 2022b), extended state observer (Yuan et al , 2019; Ferdjali et al , 2022) and disturbance observer (Ma et al , 2021; Zhang et al , 2021c), have been developed, which are also used for the control of the PSPM (Zhou et al , 2017; Liu et al , 2020; Zhang et al , 2019; Wu et al , 2020). In addition, many studies related to the UADs model have been conducted to improve the performance of the PSPM further.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, numerous effective protocols have been reported to reach consensus of MASs. These protocols include: impulsive control, pinning control, adaptive control, observer-based control, event-triggered control, faulttolerant control, neural-network-based control and etc [9,10,13,[19][20][21][22][23][24]. Among them, impulsive control is such a strategy that the controller occurs at some certain discrete moments, which dramatically reduces the communication cost by replacing instantaneous information exchanges to a small number of samples at specific instants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%