2018
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2017.2752001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Nonsmooth Optimization With Coupled Inequality Constraints via Modified Lagrangian Function

Abstract: This technical note considers a distributed convex optimization problem with nonsmooth cost functions and coupled nonlinear inequality constraints. To solve the problem, we first propose a modified Lagrangian function containing local multipliers and a nonsmooth penalty function. Then we construct a distributed continuous-time algorithm by virtue of a projected primal-dual subgradient dynamics.Based on the nonsmooth analysis and Lyapunov function, we obtain the existence of the solution to the nonsmooth algori… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison, the algorithm (6)-(9) proposed in this paper has been rigorously proved to be effective to cope with problem (5) even with inequality constraints, and the key points are to employ i instead of i in algorithm (6) and to introduce constant gains r, c in algorithm (6)- (9). Furthermore, we also note that a relatively more general scenario with coupled inequality constraints has been investigated in the literature, such as the work of Chang et al 38 for discrete-time algorithms and the work of Liang et al 39 for continuous-time algorithms, but the aforementioned works usually depends on some stringent assumptions, such as compactness of X i 's, differentiability of f i , g i 's, Lipschitz continuous gradients of g i 's, or strict convexity of f i 's, which make the problem relatively well behaved, and the techniques in the aforementioned works 38,39 are not directly applicable if these assumptions do not hold.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, the algorithm (6)-(9) proposed in this paper has been rigorously proved to be effective to cope with problem (5) even with inequality constraints, and the key points are to employ i instead of i in algorithm (6) and to introduce constant gains r, c in algorithm (6)- (9). Furthermore, we also note that a relatively more general scenario with coupled inequality constraints has been investigated in the literature, such as the work of Chang et al 38 for discrete-time algorithms and the work of Liang et al 39 for continuous-time algorithms, but the aforementioned works usually depends on some stringent assumptions, such as compactness of X i 's, differentiability of f i , g i 's, Lipschitz continuous gradients of g i 's, or strict convexity of f i 's, which make the problem relatively well behaved, and the techniques in the aforementioned works 38,39 are not directly applicable if these assumptions do not hold.…”
Section: Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, (4) contains coupled inequality constraints, which can be linear or nonlinear. This problem with continuous-time design has also been considered in (Liang et al 2018a) for undirected graphs, while we allow for weight-balanced graphs.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Theorems 3.2 -3.6 provide a complete procedure to prove that the algorithm (13) or (31) solves LCP(q, M ) in a distributed manner.…”
Section: Alternative Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, multi-agent networks have received much attention in various research fields such as distributed optimization and game [12,13,14,29,32], distributed machine learning [25] and distributed computation of equations [22,31]. In contrast to centralized computations, network based distributed algorithms do not require overall information to accomplish a task and introduce an inherent robustness to communication or sensor failures, and environmental uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%