2010
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910397107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed neural system for general intelligence revealed by lesion mapping

Abstract: General intelligence (g) captures the performance variance shared across cognitive tasks and correlates with real-world success. Yet it remains debated whether g reflects the combined performance of brain systems involved in these tasks or draws on specialized systems mediating their interactions. Here we investigated the neural substrates of g in 241 patients with focal brain damage using voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping. A hierarchical factor analysis across multiple cognitive tasks was used to derive a ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
192
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(58 reference statements)
19
192
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, factor analyses of such tests show separate as well as shared variance between subtests, and different subtests are affected by different patterns of brain damage (30). To the extent that the common element reflects fluid intelligence, however, our data suggest specific association with MD cortex (19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correspondingly, factor analyses of such tests show separate as well as shared variance between subtests, and different subtests are affected by different patterns of brain damage (30). To the extent that the common element reflects fluid intelligence, however, our data suggest specific association with MD cortex (19).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Others have reported similar deficits across frontal and parietal cortex (18). An important recent study showed correlations with g for lesions in several regions of left frontal and parietal cortex as well as for damage to major white matter tracts (19). In this study we examined the specific causal role of MD regions as defined by functional imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A regional pattern of cortical area-cognition relationships was present in all lobes. This finding fits with the notion that GCA is supported by distributed brain networks (44,45). Using genetically defined cortical clusters (6,35), there was evidence that especially prefrontal and medial and posterolateral temporal clusters related more strongly to GCA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Due to the spatial distribution of highly specialized brain areas (Gläscher et al, 2010) and that the main function of the myelin sheet is to isolate the axons, thereby facilitating conduction of action potentials over long distances, individual differences in WM structure are expected to affect cognitive performance, e.g., processing speed (O'Sullivan et al, 2001;Madden et al, 2004Madden et al, , 2009Schulte et al, 2005;Deary et al, 2006;Grieve et al, 2007;Bucur et al, 2008;Correia et al, 2008;Turken et al, 2008;Kennedy and Raz, 2009;Vernooij et al, 2009). The present results confirm a relationship between mRT from the congruent condition and DTI parameters, in that significant effects were seen for AD and MD in the genu and middle sections (body) of the corpus callosum, and in the left anterior thalamic radiation and forceps minor for AD.…”
Section: Wm Characteristics and Information Processing Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The significance of white matter (WM) integrity for cognitive function is rooted in the spatial distribution of cognitive processes in the brain, involving a complex interplay between multiple areas (Gläscher et al, 2010). Lower fiber integrity may cause less stable flow of electrical currents in dendrites and axons, resulting in neural noise, disruptions of the conduction of action potentials, and possibly increased intraindividual variability (IIV) in task performance (MacDonald et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%