2018
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2018.2868943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Low-Latency Data Aggregation for Duty-Cycle Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second scenario, each sensor node has to establish and update the table with routing information, which is not a too effective way to deliver information to a fusion center over mobile networks and networks with limited energy sources such as WSNs [9]. Therefore, the distributed schemes are more frequently applied nowadays [10][11][12][13]. In these schemes, the adjacent sensor nodes communicate with each other and update their states according to the collected data [14].…”
Section: • Distributedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the second scenario, each sensor node has to establish and update the table with routing information, which is not a too effective way to deliver information to a fusion center over mobile networks and networks with limited energy sources such as WSNs [9]. Therefore, the distributed schemes are more frequently applied nowadays [10][11][12][13]. In these schemes, the adjacent sensor nodes communicate with each other and update their states according to the collected data [14].…”
Section: • Distributedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the distributed schemes are more frequently applied nowadays [10][11][12][13]. In these schemes, the adjacent sensor nodes communicate with each other and update their states according to the collected data [14]. Thus, a fusion center is not necessary for data aggregation as well as the sensor nodes know only local information whereby data aggregation is significantly simplified.…”
Section: • Distributedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This continues until the total prize of all the combined fragments reaches Q. Finally, a traveling salesman is placed at the starting node (with the maximum mode value) in each fragment, which visits all other nodes in the fragment to collect prizes by traversing each edge at most twice, and returns the total collected prizes and total traveling cost (lines [11][12][13][14][15]. The time complexity of Algo.…”
Section: B Approximation Algorithm For Q-tspmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], another problem discussed by Hawbani et al for low-duty-cycle WSNs, they proposed a protocol based on the candidate zone and prioritisation of each node in any zone. Chen et al [19] identified the problem of the minimum latency aggregation schedule and proposed a solution distributed approximate aggregation algorithm. He et al targeted the problem of transmission delay and to overcome the problem proposes an algorithm minimise transmission delay routing (MTDR).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%