2019
DOI: 10.1177/1550147719895952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed hybrid consensus–based square-root cubature quadrature information filter and its application to maneuvering target tracking

Abstract: To handle nonlinear filtering problems with networked sensors in a distributed manner, a novel distributed hybrid consensus–based square-root cubature quadrature information filter is proposed. The proposed hybrid consensus–based square-root cubature quadrature information filter exploits fifth-order spherical simplex-radial quadrature rule to tackle system nonlinearities and incorporates a novel measurement update strategy into the hybrid consensus filtering framework, which takes the predicted measurement er… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(141 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The corresponding prior error and prediction estimate error are expressed as ηˆi,tfalse∣ttruexˆi,tfalse∣txt ${\widehat{\eta }}_{i,t\vert t}\triangleq {\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t\vert t}-{x}_{t}$ and ηˆi,t+1false∣ttruexˆi,t+1false∣txt ${\widehat{\eta }}_{i,t+1\vert t}\triangleq {\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t+1\vert t}-{x}_{t}$ respectively, where truexˆi,tfalse∣t=double-struckC[]truexˆi,tt ${\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t\vert t}=\mathbb{C}\left[{\widehat{x}}_{i,t\vert t}\right]$, truexˆi,t+1false∣t=double-struckC[]truexˆi,t+1t ${\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t+1\vert t}=\mathbb{C}\left[{\widehat{x}}_{i,t+1\vert t}\right]$, x t is the unknown real state. The pseudo transition matrix can be computed using the statistical linear error propagation methodology [5] as Fi,tPi,()xtfalse∣t,xt+1false∣tTYi,tfalse∣t, ${F}_{i,t}\approx {P}_{i,\left({x}_{t\vert t},{x}_{t+1\vert t}\right)}^{\mathrm{T}}{Y}_{i,t\vert t},$ where Pi,()xtfalse∣t,xt+1false∣t ${P}_{i,\left({x}_{t\vert t},{x}_{t+1\vert t}\right)}$…”
Section: Consistency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The corresponding prior error and prediction estimate error are expressed as ηˆi,tfalse∣ttruexˆi,tfalse∣txt ${\widehat{\eta }}_{i,t\vert t}\triangleq {\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t\vert t}-{x}_{t}$ and ηˆi,t+1false∣ttruexˆi,t+1false∣txt ${\widehat{\eta }}_{i,t+1\vert t}\triangleq {\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t+1\vert t}-{x}_{t}$ respectively, where truexˆi,tfalse∣t=double-struckC[]truexˆi,tt ${\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t\vert t}=\mathbb{C}\left[{\widehat{x}}_{i,t\vert t}\right]$, truexˆi,t+1false∣t=double-struckC[]truexˆi,t+1t ${\tilde{\widehat{x}}}_{i,t+1\vert t}=\mathbb{C}\left[{\widehat{x}}_{i,t+1\vert t}\right]$, x t is the unknown real state. The pseudo transition matrix can be computed using the statistical linear error propagation methodology [5] as Fi,tPi,()xtfalse∣t,xt+1false∣tTYi,tfalse∣t, ${F}_{i,t}\approx {P}_{i,\left({x}_{t\vert t},{x}_{t+1\vert t}\right)}^{\mathrm{T}}{Y}_{i,t\vert t},$ where Pi,()xtfalse∣t,xt+1false∣t ${P}_{i,\left({x}_{t\vert t},{x}_{t+1\vert t}\right)}$…”
Section: Consistency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark We have not made simulation comparisons between DSRFCIF and the distributed square root cubature information filtering [5] on the probability framework. It is because the possibility method does not always perform better than the probability method.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations