2017 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/radar.2017.7944432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed fusion with PHD filter for multi-target tracking in asynchronous radar system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trajectory of each object is determined at the beginning of radar scanning; then, measurement information from the sensors is used to update the initially established target track. When measurement data (echo) from the sensor enters the target's tracking gate, the echo is called a valid measurement (or valid back) wave [28][29][30][31]. Even with only one target, there may be multiple valid measurements due to clutter interference.…”
Section: Target Tracking Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory of each object is determined at the beginning of radar scanning; then, measurement information from the sensors is used to update the initially established target track. When measurement data (echo) from the sensor enters the target's tracking gate, the echo is called a valid measurement (or valid back) wave [28][29][30][31]. Even with only one target, there may be multiple valid measurements due to clutter interference.…”
Section: Target Tracking Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that each target evolves and generates observations independently of one another, the clutter is independent of target-originated measurements, and the clutter and predicted multitarget RFS follow a Poisson distribution. Let v k (•) denotes the multitarget posterior density intensity, γ k (x) denotes the intensity of the birth RFS k at time k, β k|k−1 (• | ς) denotes the intensity of the RFS B k|k−1 (ς ) spawned at time k by a target with previous state ς , κ k (z) denotes the intensity of clutter RFS K k at time k, then the posterior intensity can be propagated by the PHD recursion: (11) According to GMM theory and GMPHD algorithm, the Equations (12) and (13) could be substituted by Equations (10) and 11:…”
Section: Gmphd Filter Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random Finite Set (RFS) [8]. In addition, these approaches have been well developed and widely applied in such as sonar [9], [10], radar [11], biology [12], autonomous vehicle [13], [14], automotive recognition [15], and sensor network [16], [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GCI fusion amounts to computing the density that minimizes the sum of the information gains (Kullback-Leibler divergences [7,19], KLD) from local posteriors, thus avoiding the problem of double-counting of common information [25]. In the past years, any distributed RFS filters based on the GCI fusion rule have been proposed [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%