2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed formation building algorithms for groups of wheeled mobile robots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, flocking provided the asymptotic stability for formation control and formation shape was achieved by a synchronizing velocity vector of individual vehicles. In another publication, considering the problem of decentralized flocking and global formation building of the group of wheeled robots, a randomized decentralized navigation algorithm was presented where autonomous vehicles move in the same direction with the same speed, thus forming a formation [77]. Here, each robot did not know a priori its position in the desired configuration, and the robots attained consensus on their positions via local information exchange.…”
Section: Flockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, flocking provided the asymptotic stability for formation control and formation shape was achieved by a synchronizing velocity vector of individual vehicles. In another publication, considering the problem of decentralized flocking and global formation building of the group of wheeled robots, a randomized decentralized navigation algorithm was presented where autonomous vehicles move in the same direction with the same speed, thus forming a formation [77]. Here, each robot did not know a priori its position in the desired configuration, and the robots attained consensus on their positions via local information exchange.…”
Section: Flockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Recent applications are seen in the control of pattern formation of fleets of autonomous car-like vehicles or swarms of unmanned aerial vehicles for tasks such as aiding traffic management of automated highways, environmental monitoring, search-and-rescue in hazardous environments, and area coverage and reconnaissance. [2][3][4] An exciting development in this area of research is the use of swarm principles to design the controllers. Animal swarming is considered an instance of collective selforganization, which is defined in the study by Camazine et al 5 as "a broad range of pattern-formation processes in both physical and biological systems, with the pattern being an emergent property of the system, rather than a property imposed on the system by an external ordering influence."…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, the decentralized control considers that the formation characteristics are shared among the participants at a very high level, where the control actions to maintain the desired grouping are calculated for each vehicle individually. Although both configurations require some type of intercommunication to ensure satisfactory execution, the second case requires high reliability of data exchange to achieve the control objectives [17]. A considerable advantage of decentralized control is the integration of different control methods to the group of robots, taking into account that generally for cooperative robotics, the most important aspect is to maintain the position of the robotic set into a trajectory or path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%