2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.5802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed finite‐time tracking control for multiple uncertain Euler–Lagrange systems with input saturations and error constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we need to tune the parameters ϑi and λi appropriately in compromise among the rapidity, tracking error and smoothness. The parameters υi and Fi in the adaptive law also need to be tuned to keep a balance between the learning rates and final formation tracking error. Remark 11 Since the necessary Assumption 3 is made to satisfy the condition of universal approximation theorem that fifalse(xifalse) is approximated by RBFNNs over a compact set, the results of this paper are not global. Remark 12 Actually, ensuring the tracking error in a desired range is of great significance and meaningfulness in practice since the better transient and steady‐state performance and communication could be obtained [31, 47, 48]. Similar to [31], the following tan‐type barrier Lyapunov function can be adopted to constrain the formation tracking errors in a predefined range. Vbi= kbi2πtanπei,1Tei,12knormalbi2…”
Section: Formation Tracking Control Scheme Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we need to tune the parameters ϑi and λi appropriately in compromise among the rapidity, tracking error and smoothness. The parameters υi and Fi in the adaptive law also need to be tuned to keep a balance between the learning rates and final formation tracking error. Remark 11 Since the necessary Assumption 3 is made to satisfy the condition of universal approximation theorem that fifalse(xifalse) is approximated by RBFNNs over a compact set, the results of this paper are not global. Remark 12 Actually, ensuring the tracking error in a desired range is of great significance and meaningfulness in practice since the better transient and steady‐state performance and communication could be obtained [31, 47, 48]. Similar to [31], the following tan‐type barrier Lyapunov function can be adopted to constrain the formation tracking errors in a predefined range. Vbi= kbi2πtanπei,1Tei,12knormalbi2…”
Section: Formation Tracking Control Scheme Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the linear parameterisation‐based adaptive methods require that the uncertainty terms can be parameterised and the regressor matrixes, which are known in advance, satisfy the peresistently exiciting (PE) condition, which is really critical in practice. Therefore, as a universal approximator, neural network (NN) which is independent of prior knowledge and only requires the estimated functions to be smooth on the compact sets, is increasingly applied to compensate the unknown uncertainties, and fruitful results are obtained in the consensus or formation control for multi‐agent systems [2931]. Nevertheless, there is a common problem that too many parameters need to be updated online in the adaptive laws in all the aforementioned results, which may be burdensome and time consuming in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many practical applications, the fast convergence rate, as an important performance index in evaluating the control performance of the system, is required in the robotic manipulator control. In recent years, many efforts have been devoted to this issue, such as the finite/fixed‐time control 9‐19 . In Reference 15, the terminal sliding‐mode control scheme was designed for the robotic systems to realize the finite‐time convergence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By designing a distributed finite‐time sliding‐mode estimator, Li et al 24 investigated the distributed attitude coordinated tracking problem for multiple spacecraft systems with attitude constraints and model uncertainties. However, the finite time problem was not considered in the work of Li et al 24 In the work of Chen et al, 25 the distributed finite‐time tracking control was considered for multiple uncertain Euler‐Lagrange systems with input saturations and error constraints. However, neither of the models discussed belong to high‐order nonlinear multiagent systems with the powers of positive odd rational number.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%