2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2022.103501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed fibre optic monitoring of mode I fatigue crack propagation in adhesive bonded joints and comparison with digital image correlation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, delamination growth occurs at lower loads than the static case, resulting in a lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from a DOFS perspective. Moreover, depending on the laminate characteristics, the strain field in the process zone can be different [32]. Stutz et al show that fiber bridging modifies the expected strain value in the process zone, which affects the damage index used to build POD curves [33].…”
Section: Mapod Concept For Dofssmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, delamination growth occurs at lower loads than the static case, resulting in a lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) from a DOFS perspective. Moreover, depending on the laminate characteristics, the strain field in the process zone can be different [32]. Stutz et al show that fiber bridging modifies the expected strain value in the process zone, which affects the damage index used to build POD curves [33].…”
Section: Mapod Concept For Dofssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, depending on the laminate characteristics, the strain field in the process zone can be different [ 32 ]. Stutz et al show that fiber bridging modifies the expected strain value in the process zone, which affects the damage index used to build POD curves [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to introduce in‐situ monitoring techniques for damage inspection of adhesively bonded joints due to moisture. Recently, several in‐situ monitoring techniques, such as fiber optic monitoring, X‐ray microtomography, digital image correlation, acoustic emissions, and mechanoluminescence, have been introduced to observe crack propagation in adhesive joints 15–19 . However, until now, there are almost no methods for direct measurement of water penetration in the adhesive layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several in-situ monitoring techniques, such as fiber optic monitoring, X-ray microtomography, digital image correlation, acoustic emissions, and mechanoluminescence, have been introduced to observe crack propagation in adhesive joints. [15][16][17][18][19] However, until now, there are almost no methods for direct measurement of water penetration in the adhesive layer. Degradation due to water absorption is therefore only speculative and insitu monitoring of moisture distribution is essential to discuss what is happening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic emissions have also been demonstrated suitable for online monitoring in a laboratory environment [31]. In [32], the authors proposed the shifts in the strain peak measured by distributed fiber optic sensors as features to quantitatively monitor crack growth in double cantilever beam specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%