2013
DOI: 10.2514/1.59453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Estimation for Motion Coordination in an Unknown Spatially Varying Flowfield

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in the formation control, 32,33 a single task, the cooperative control with switching topologies is more challenging in comparison with the fixed cases. Distinguishing from the existing results based on fixed bidirectional networks, [19][20][21][22]29,36 this paper is the first attempt to access to the problem of spherical formation tracking control in unknown flowfields with switching directed topologies and our proposed control laws as well as the flow observers also do not require any global information of each directed topology, which is the third contribution of this paper. Different from the differential Lyapunov-based method used in the works of Dong et al, 32,33 the Lyapunov functions constructed in this paper are nondifferential with deriving from the time-varying left eigenvector of Lapalacian matrix associated with each switching topology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even in the formation control, 32,33 a single task, the cooperative control with switching topologies is more challenging in comparison with the fixed cases. Distinguishing from the existing results based on fixed bidirectional networks, [19][20][21][22]29,36 this paper is the first attempt to access to the problem of spherical formation tracking control in unknown flowfields with switching directed topologies and our proposed control laws as well as the flow observers also do not require any global information of each directed topology, which is the third contribution of this paper. Different from the differential Lyapunov-based method used in the works of Dong et al, 32,33 the Lyapunov functions constructed in this paper are nondifferential with deriving from the time-varying left eigenvector of Lapalacian matrix associated with each switching topology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…It is worth noting that the control objectives in this paper contain the tracking of sphere and circle, the lateral formation, the flow estimation, and the avoidance of each agent's trajectory to Earth's axis due to the undefined lateral formation, a multigoal tasks, which is more complicated and difficult to be controlled than the tradition formation control problem [30][31][32][33] and the single consensus problem under the directed strongly connected topology. 34,35 The second contribution of this paper is to present a new robust spherical formation tracking control law with flow estimates that do not used any global information of network (eg, the left eigenvector of Lapalacian matrix) and applicable to almost all flow forms with uncertain parameter vectors including the velocity field (eg, the constant-velocity flowfield, 19 the rotating flowfield, 20 the parameterized flowfield, 21 and the Eulerian specification flowfields 22,29,36 ) and the gravitational fields. 37,38 In this paper, we introduce adaptive backstepping to construct two kinds of observers (say, the second-order observer and the minimum-order observer) for the velocity field and an adaptive update law for the estimation of the gravitational field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distributed estimation technology has been commonly used in process control, signal processing, and information systems. [15][16][17][18] A subset of these efforts has generally been focused on the integration of measurements from all the sensors into a common estimate without using a centralized processor. For example, the work of Olfati-Saber 19 has contributed a great deal of work toward achieving an average consensus among distributed filters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applications of average consensus include formation control [1], distributed Kriged Kalman filtering [2], distributed merging of feature-based maps [3], and distributed estimation for motion coordination [4]. We study the problem of average consensus over a random graph topology using the polynomial linear protocol with focus on the proportional (P) and proportional-integral (PI) estimators [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%