2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcss.2011.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed data possession checking for securing multiple replicas in geographically-dispersed clouds

Abstract: Distributing multiple replicas in geographically-dispersed clouds is a popular approach to reduce latency to users. It is important to ensure that each replica should have availability and data integrity features; that is, the same as the original data without any corruption and tampering. Remote data possession checking is a valid method to verify the replicas's availability and integrity. Since remotely checking the entire data is time-consuming due to both the large data volume and the limited bandwidth, ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that bandwidths are asymmetric between geographically distributed sites, distributed multiple replicas data possession checking (DMRDPC) scheme 13 is proposed to improve challenging cost at both sides. At first, an optimal spanning tree needs to be found in a complete bidirectional directed graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that bandwidths are asymmetric between geographically distributed sites, distributed multiple replicas data possession checking (DMRDPC) scheme 13 is proposed to improve challenging cost at both sides. At first, an optimal spanning tree needs to be found in a complete bidirectional directed graph.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the cost for both replica generating and proof validating will grow linearly to the number of replicas. Another alternative is to improve existing single data possession proving solutions to solve MR‐PDP problem 4,12,13 . However, they are either lack of efficiency, because each replica should be validated one by one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our solution is orthogonal to external audits by the owner of the objects, or by an external auditor . It is also complementary to encrypted storage of files in the cloud, with schemes such as the one in Samanthula et al…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%