2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11527-005-9005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed cracking and stiffness degradation in fabric-cement composites

Abstract: Formation of distributed cracking and the associated degradation in the stiffness of fabric-cement composites under tensile loading were studied. Composites made from low modulus woven polyethylene fabric and bonded Alkali Resistant (AR) glass mesh were manufactured by means of pultrusion technique. The influence of fabric type, matrix modification and curing as well as the pressure applied after pultrusion were studied using tensile stress strain response. Three distinct measures of damage including quantitat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In glass-aramid composites, e II is between 40% and 50% of the peak strain for G-M and G-P series and about 90% for G-ML and G-L, indicating the predominance of the crack development stage. Conversely, e II is 29% of the peak strain for S4-C, 2% and 5% for S4-ML and S12-C and, finally, not even detectable for S12-ML, in which the contribution of the reinforcement fabric is largely prevalent with respect to that of the matrix, as already found in [30] for TRC.…”
Section: Composite Specimens: Monotonic Testssupporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In glass-aramid composites, e II is between 40% and 50% of the peak strain for G-M and G-P series and about 90% for G-ML and G-L, indicating the predominance of the crack development stage. Conversely, e II is 29% of the peak strain for S4-C, 2% and 5% for S4-ML and S12-C and, finally, not even detectable for S12-ML, in which the contribution of the reinforcement fabric is largely prevalent with respect to that of the matrix, as already found in [30] for TRC.…”
Section: Composite Specimens: Monotonic Testssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…15b), which are not directly connected to the matrix. Such telescopic failure is likely to be due to the weaker bond between filaments than that between outer filaments and mortar [30]. Differently, in steel composites, no sliding of the cords within the matrix occurs (Fig.…”
Section: Failure Modementioning
confidence: 95%
“…The nature of multiple cracking and the resulting stress-strain curve, toughness, and strength, are dependent on the properties of the reinforcing fabrics, the cement matrix, as well as the interface bond and the anchorage of the fabrics developed [15]. Microstructural features such as crack spacing, width, and density allow formulation of the damage evolution as a function of macroscopically applied strain [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRC composites utilize innovative fabrics, matrices, and manufacturing processes and have as much as one order of magnitude higher strength, and as much as two orders of magnitude higher in ductility than fiber reinforced concrete [2,3]. Uniaxial tensile strength as high as 25 MPa, and strain capacity of 1-8% are routinely obtained [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uniaxial tensile strength as high as 25 MPa, and strain capacity of 1-8% are routinely obtained [4,5]. A variety of fiber and fabric systems such as alkali resistant glass fibers (G), polypropylene (P), PVA, aramid (A), and carbon (C) have been utilized [2,6,7]. In order to fully utilize these materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%