2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2020.108959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed convergence to Nash equilibria in network and average aggregative games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unrealistic that these participants will adopt any centralized methods that require cooperation among them. Because of this, there is an enduring research interest in distributing the computation of Nash equilibria [15], [16], especially through the avenue of operator splitting technique [17], [18]. In addition to the distributed computation, under most circumstances, participants can only have access to the local information and decisions of their neighbors, which constitutes a partialdecision information setting [19]- [21].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unrealistic that these participants will adopt any centralized methods that require cooperation among them. Because of this, there is an enduring research interest in distributing the computation of Nash equilibria [15], [16], especially through the avenue of operator splitting technique [17], [18]. In addition to the distributed computation, under most circumstances, participants can only have access to the local information and decisions of their neighbors, which constitutes a partialdecision information setting [19]- [21].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our proposed solution to the above problem is inspired by some recent work in non-cooperative games on networks, i.e., the generalized Nash equilibrium problem (GNEP) [12], which has attracted increasing research interest, especially through the avenue of operator splitting [13], [14], [15]. For example, the algorithms proposed in [16], [17] carry out multiple rounds of communication within each iteration. With sufficient rounds of information exchange, the proposed This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second class of aggregative games (partial-information case), there is no population coordinator. Instead, the agents exchange information with each other through a network [14], where the aggregative term can be defined either as local [15] or global [16]. Recently, the authors in [17] proposed a fully-distributed algorithm for seeking a generalized Nash equilibrium that exploits an interconnection of dynamic tracking of the aggregate term, projected-pseudo-gradient dynamics and Krasnoselskij-Mann (KM) iterations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%