2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Control in Virtualized Networks

Abstract: The increasing number of the Internet connected devices requires novel solutions to control the next generation network resources. The cooperation between the Software Defined Network (SDN) and the Network Function Virtualization (NFV) seems to be a promising technology paradigm. The bottleneck of current SDN/NFV implementations is the use of a centralized controller. In this paper, different scenarios to identify the pro and cons of a distributed control-plane were investigated. We implemented a prototypal fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an architectural improvement (Fig. 1.b) consists in physically distributing the SDN Control Plane among 𝐾 SDN Controllers, arranged to form a cluster, with a node playing the role of cluster coordinator [20].…”
Section: B Software Defined Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an architectural improvement (Fig. 1.b) consists in physically distributing the SDN Control Plane among 𝐾 SDN Controllers, arranged to form a cluster, with a node playing the role of cluster coordinator [20].…”
Section: B Software Defined Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Tootoonchian et al (2012), the authors evaluate the performance of the floodlight controller on a single server and shown that it can handle over 1.6 million requests per second with an average response time of 2 ms. Also, the authors in Zuccaro et al (2015) present the evaluation result of SDN performance, where the authors run a single controller and determine that a single controller can control up to 5,000 switches with 46 cores. They were able to achieve a throughput of 14 million flows per second with a latency of 200 μs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%