2017 American Control Conference (ACC) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/acc.2017.7963678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed consensus with multi-equilibria in directed networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for the secondary layer subgraphs, there is a unique root that receives information from the rest of the graph which we call the principal root of the subgraph and denote by r Gs,j . Note here that with the above definition, each vertex in G will either be in a primary or a secondary layer subgraph and these subgraphs can be uniquely determined [9,10]. Note also that an isolated vertex is a primary layer subgraph itself by definition.…”
Section: Consist Of a Spanning Treementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, for the secondary layer subgraphs, there is a unique root that receives information from the rest of the graph which we call the principal root of the subgraph and denote by r Gs,j . Note here that with the above definition, each vertex in G will either be in a primary or a secondary layer subgraph and these subgraphs can be uniquely determined [9,10]. Note also that an isolated vertex is a primary layer subgraph itself by definition.…”
Section: Consist Of a Spanning Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 2.10. In previous studies, it is shown that the number of groups formed in a multi-agent network with agent dynamics (1) or (2) is defined as K = l p + l s , i. e., the sum of the number of primary and secondary layer subgraphs [9,10]. One of the main objectives of this paper is to design an algorithm that can be used to generate a directed graph with the desired numbers of primary and secondary layer subgraphs, and the desired numbers of agents in each subgraph.…”
Section: Consist Of a Spanning Treementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network without Spanning Trees. Without loss of generality, we suppose that has the following form [26]…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 1 is a Laplacian matrix and its corresponding subgraph has a spanning tree (isolated node can be seen as a subgraph that has a spanning tree with itself being the root). In [26], the subgraphs corresponding to , = 1, . .…”
Section: Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation