The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090924-3-it-4005.00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Consensus on Boolean Information

Abstract: In this paper we study the convergence towards consensus on information in a distributed system of agents communicating over a network. The particularity of this study is that the information on which the consensus is seeked is not represented by real numbers, rather by logical values or compact sets. Whereas the problems of allowing a network of agents to reach a consensus on logical functions of input events, and that of agreeing on set-valued information, have been separately addressed in previous work, in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) by using the pair (C * , V * j ), the incidence matrix of the iteration map, has a strictly lower-triangular form. Thus, from Fagiolini et al (2009b), follows that the network reaches an agreement on a unique equilibrium in a finite number of steps.…”
Section: Distributed Synthesis Of a Robust Consensus Map: The Self-routing Robustmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(3) by using the pair (C * , V * j ), the incidence matrix of the iteration map, has a strictly lower-triangular form. Thus, from Fagiolini et al (2009b), follows that the network reaches an agreement on a unique equilibrium in a finite number of steps.…”
Section: Distributed Synthesis Of a Robust Consensus Map: The Self-routing Robustmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is achieved by extending the notions of convergence, local convergence, and contraction, already given in the binary domain [14], [15], to algebras of sets, taken with the union, intersection, and complement operations. The work presented here builds upon earlier results by the authors [16], where global convergence of Set-Valued Boolean Dynamic Systems (SVBDS) 2 was studied, and it provides also results on local convergence in terms of properties of binary matrices for which analysis [14], [15] and synthesis [8] results are available. These new results are mainly, but not only, contained in the following theorems: Theorem 4.1 of Section IV, Lemma 5.1, Theorem 5.2, Theorem 5.2, and Theorem 5.4 of Section V. By doing this, we believe that the present work is a step toward the definition of a unified framework for the convergence analysis of systems involving iterative maps based on Boolean algebras, and for the design of Boolean iterative systems producing consensus in such domains.…”
Section: X(t + 1) = Ax(t) + Bu(t)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The following Proposition 3.1-3.5 are based on results that were first presented in the conference paper [16].…”
Section: Set-valued Boolean Dynamic Systems-global Convergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therein, the objective is attained through use of a set-valued consensus algorithm, where local agents exchange data representing free and occupied regions of the environment. Whereas these problems have been separately addressed in different manners, we proposed in [11] the notion of Boolean consensus systems as a unifying framework for achieving consensus on Boolean information (not only including binary data). In fact, what really prevents, in our opinion, a wide exploitation of the multi-agent paradigm is the lack of a systematic approach to the design of a generic consensus algorithm that is applicable in a vast number of scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%