2020
DOI: 10.1002/asjc.2473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed consensus control for networked linear agents via event‐triggered communications

Abstract: This paper deals with the distributed consensus of networked linear agents via event‐driven communications by exploring relative‐state and relative‐output feedbacks. First, an alternative event‐triggered consensus design is proposed, consisting of a distributed controller with the relative‐state feedback and an event‐based communication policy, both of which can avoid employing the eigenvalues of the Laplacian matrix. Under the proposed scheme, it is proved that the residual consensus error is bounded, which i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the controller (2) in this paper is only designed from the prospective of avoiding periodic impulse input. This is because the time-varying delay term 𝜏(t) is difficult to deal with in the analysis of the average consensus for the considered delayed nonlinear multi-agent system under the controller (24). It is our future effort to study the consensus problems for multi-agent systems with more economical and effective event-triggered impulsive controllers.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Suppose That the Graph G Is Strongly Connected And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the controller (2) in this paper is only designed from the prospective of avoiding periodic impulse input. This is because the time-varying delay term 𝜏(t) is difficult to deal with in the analysis of the average consensus for the considered delayed nonlinear multi-agent system under the controller (24). It is our future effort to study the consensus problems for multi-agent systems with more economical and effective event-triggered impulsive controllers.…”
Section: Theorem 1 Suppose That the Graph G Is Strongly Connected And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was first proposed by Å rz é n [18], for which the information is transmitted not periodically but in accordance with a certain event‐triggering condition, and it obviously has much better resource utilization. The event‐triggering controlled systems have drawn increasing research attention during the past decades [6,19–24]. More recently, a novel control scheme named event‐triggered impulsive control has been introduced in Du et al [25] to improve the control performance by combining impulsive control with event‐triggered control efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How to ensure the stability of the system and reduce network load is a hot research topic in network communication. Many different types of triggering schemes have been put forward to overcome the limited bandwidth resources [16][17][18][19]. There are time-triggered and event-triggered scheme (ETS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, distributed event-triggered control depends on the states of each agent and their neighbors, resulting in inconsistent execution of control policy and triggering instants. For example, [30,31] propose a distributed control protocol for linear MASs to investigate the event-triggered consensus problem. And these control protocols do not require continuous communication between neighboring agents, and the update time for control strategies of each agent are dependent on its own state and the states of its neighboring agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%