2013
DOI: 10.1109/mic.2013.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Computing on an Ensemble of Browsers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason is that starting with Google's Chrome v8 in 2008, new JavaScript (JS) engines with just-in-time (JIT) compilers allowed JS code to rival Java [19]. When compared to Java, JavaScript was found to be slower only by about one third in math-intensive computation [60], though significant speed differences may exist between JS engines of different browsers [47].…”
Section: The Third Generation: Fast and The Furiously Multithreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One reason is that starting with Google's Chrome v8 in 2008, new JavaScript (JS) engines with just-in-time (JIT) compilers allowed JS code to rival Java [19]. When compared to Java, JavaScript was found to be slower only by about one third in math-intensive computation [60], though significant speed differences may exist between JS engines of different browsers [47].…”
Section: The Third Generation: Fast and The Furiously Multithreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WeevilScout [19] uses a WebCL code wrapped in JavaScript. New jobs submitted to WeevilScout can be written in JavaScript.…”
Section: The Third Generation: Fast and The Furiously Multithreadingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations