2013
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2012.2206720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Circular Formation Stabilization for Dynamic Unicycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c Remark 2. Different from the existing time-varying or discontinuous controllers in the literatures, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] which addressed the leaderless consensus/formation control problem of nonholonomic systems, the distributed controller (equation (11) or (13)) is smooth, timeinvariant, and static. The achievement of this relies heavily on the Lyapunov function V 1 constructed in equation (4).…”
Section: Let Us Definementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c Remark 2. Different from the existing time-varying or discontinuous controllers in the literatures, [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] which addressed the leaderless consensus/formation control problem of nonholonomic systems, the distributed controller (equation (11) or (13)) is smooth, timeinvariant, and static. The achievement of this relies heavily on the Lyapunov function V 1 constructed in equation (4).…”
Section: Let Us Definementioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 For any individual nonholonomic system, there exists no continuous time-invariant static controller that asymptotically stabilizes the state of system to a fixed point, 17 and hence, only the time-varying or discontinuous controller 18 can achieve asymptotic stabilization. For multiple leaderless consensus case, most of the published references still focus on the design of time-varying, discontinuous, or dynamic controller, see the literatures [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] which achieve the leaderless consensus/formation control of multiple nonholonomic systems. In addition, it was reported in the study by Zhai et al 30 that the smooth time-invariant static distributed control law can realize the asymptotic leaderless consensus of the nonholonomic chained systems over undirected connected graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we use the results of Section II to develop a hybrid resetting controller of the form (3)-(5) to achieve circular formations [27] involving cyclic pursuit [16], [28], [29]. The proposed controller has a leaderless, dynamic distributed architecture, which is more robust and exhibits faster convergence than static, leader-based or partially leaderless control designs [27], [16], [28], [29].…”
Section: Hybrid Control Design For Cyclic Pursuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed controller has a leaderless, dynamic distributed architecture, which is more robust and exhibits faster convergence than static, leader-based or partially leaderless control designs [27], [16], [28], [29]. Consider q mobile autonomous agents in a plane described by the unicycle model given bẏ…”
Section: Hybrid Control Design For Cyclic Pursuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deployment of mobile agents in one-dimensional space has received increasing attention in recent years [15][16][17][18][19]. In [15], a Kuramoto-like model is proposed for balanced deployment of multiple robots on a circle, where the goal is to distribute the robots equally on a circle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%