2010
DOI: 10.1137/080733826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distributed Broadcast in Unknown Radio Networks

Abstract: We consider the problem of broadcasting in \ud an unknown radio network modeled as a\ud directed graph $G=(V,E)$, where $|V|=n$.\ud In unknown networks, every node knows only its own label, while it \ud is unaware of any other parameter of the network, including\ud its neighborhood and even any upper bound on the\ud number of nodes.\ud We show an $\bO(n\log n\log\log n)$ upper bound on the time complexity of deterministic\ud broadcasting. This improves over the currently best upper bound $\bO(n\log^2 n)$ \ud … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first two of them are the same as in Algorithm Bound-Broadcast-Check from [6]: in the first stage all nodes learn an upper bound on n within a factor of 2, and in the second stage each node learns its distance from the source. The rest of the algorithm contains a crucial difference which permits us to improve the time O (nD) of Algorithm Bound-BroadcastCheck to the currently best known time of broadcasting without acknowledgement, which is the minimum of O (n log 2 D) [12] and O (n log n log log n) [13]. Instead of interleaving phases of broadcasting and phases of acknowledgement, as it was done in Algorithm Bound-BroadcastCheck and which was a time-consuming procedure, we first try to learn an approximate value of D and only then broadcast.…”
Section: Availability Of Collision Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first two of them are the same as in Algorithm Bound-Broadcast-Check from [6]: in the first stage all nodes learn an upper bound on n within a factor of 2, and in the second stage each node learns its distance from the source. The rest of the algorithm contains a crucial difference which permits us to improve the time O (nD) of Algorithm Bound-BroadcastCheck to the currently best known time of broadcasting without acknowledgement, which is the minimum of O (n log 2 D) [12] and O (n log n log log n) [13]. Instead of interleaving phases of broadcasting and phases of acknowledgement, as it was done in Algorithm Bound-BroadcastCheck and which was a time-consuming procedure, we first try to learn an approximate value of D and only then broadcast.…”
Section: Availability Of Collision Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of these papers was to construct broadcasting algorithms working as fast as possible in arbitrary (directed) radio networks without knowing their topology. The currently fastest deterministic broadcasting algorithms for such networks have running times O (n log 2 D) [12] and O (n log n log log n) [13]. On the other hand, in [11] an (n log D) lower bound on broadcasting time was proved for directed n-node networks with source eccentricity D. Randomized broadcasting algorithms in radio networks were studied in [2,12,26,24].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of these papers was to construct broadcasting algorithms working as fast as possible in arbitrary (directed) radio networks without knowing their topology. The currently fastest deterministic broadcasting algorithms for such networks have running times O(n log 2 D) [10] and O(n log n log log n) [11]. On the other hand, in [9] an Ω(n log D) lower bound on broadcasting time was proved for directed n-node networks of diameter D.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A broadcast from a synchronized start in a radio network was considered in [10,16,17,18,23,24,43]. The general problem of waking up a multi-hop radio network was studied in [11,12,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%