2016
DOI: 10.21276/aimdr.2016.2.6.de3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distraction Osteogenesis

Abstract: For centuries, many different techniques have been used in an attempt to modify bone growth, both in terms of amount & the direction. Orthodontists, for example, use intraoral & extraoral appliance to restrict growth of the maxilla in hopes of accentuating mandibular sagittal growth. There are several new approaches that have been developed to correct severe anterioposterior, transverse & vertical deformities of the craniofacial skeleton. One of these alternative approaches is the method of gradual bone distra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in 1973 reported mandibular lengthening in canine species using extraoral distractors following which many similar animal experiments were conducted by eminent researchers that proved DO is not restricted to long bones. [ 4 5 6 ] McCarthy et al . in 1992 performed mandibular lengthening of four syndromic patients (hemifacial microsomia, Nager syndrome) using DO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 1973 reported mandibular lengthening in canine species using extraoral distractors following which many similar animal experiments were conducted by eminent researchers that proved DO is not restricted to long bones. [ 4 5 6 ] McCarthy et al . in 1992 performed mandibular lengthening of four syndromic patients (hemifacial microsomia, Nager syndrome) using DO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%