2018
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000005053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distraction Osteogenesis for Unicoronal Craniosynostosis: Rotational Flap Technique and Case Series

Abstract: Therapeutic, IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal craniosynostosis can achieve a significant increase in intracranial volume, with a distraction efficiency of 0.99 to 1.3 percent increase in intracranial volume per millimeter of distraction. 16,17 Compared to conventional fronto-orbital advancement, distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal craniosynostosis can be performed at an earlier age (4.8 months versus 9.3 months) and has decreased duration of surgery (127 minutes versus 169 minutes), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (1.4 days versus 2.8 days), decreased hospital length of stay (2.4 days versus 4.2 days), less overall blood loss (169 ml versus 400 ml), less blood loss as percentage of total blood volume (32 percent versus 58 percent), and decreased transfusion requirements (255 ml versus 538 ml). 13 Endoscope-assisted osteotomies and placement of distractors combines these concepts as we continue to evolve our treatment of unicoronal craniosynostosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal craniosynostosis can achieve a significant increase in intracranial volume, with a distraction efficiency of 0.99 to 1.3 percent increase in intracranial volume per millimeter of distraction. 16,17 Compared to conventional fronto-orbital advancement, distraction osteogenesis for unicoronal craniosynostosis can be performed at an earlier age (4.8 months versus 9.3 months) and has decreased duration of surgery (127 minutes versus 169 minutes), decreased intensive care unit length of stay (1.4 days versus 2.8 days), decreased hospital length of stay (2.4 days versus 4.2 days), less overall blood loss (169 ml versus 400 ml), less blood loss as percentage of total blood volume (32 percent versus 58 percent), and decreased transfusion requirements (255 ml versus 538 ml). 13 Endoscope-assisted osteotomies and placement of distractors combines these concepts as we continue to evolve our treatment of unicoronal craniosynostosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another observation was narrowing of bifrontal and lateral orbital width, which is a well-documented observation following trigonocephaly correction (Wes et al, 2014; Patel et al, 2016). While the cause(s) of such are unclear, it has been hypothesized that it is a combination of soft tissue recoil (ie, scalp and muscle) and devascularized bone (Bennett et al, 2018; Brandel et al, 2018). For this reason and to limit the potential for contour irregularities along the forehead, others have proposed “abandoning the bandeau” for other means of frontal advancement (Fearon et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distraction osteogenesis for craniosynostosis may afford a greater degree of osseous movement than could be achieved with conventional cranial vault remodeling intraoperatively due to gradual stretching of soft tissues. Specifically for unicoronal craniosynostosis, distraction osteogenesis has been shown to have a distraction efficiency of 0.99% to 1.3% increase in intracranial volume per millimeter of distraction 22,23 . Gradual expansion minimizes the dead space formed with large immediate movements, which has been shown to decrease the risk of infection in combined cranial-midfacial surgery (ie monobloc advancement) and may decrease risk for transcranial infection in cranial surgery (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%