2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distraction during relational reasoning: The role of prefrontal cortex in interference control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
96
3
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
11
96
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The current findings indicate that the odors were not integrated into a relational network that enabled the flexible memory expression in the form of transitive inference. Damage to the prefrontal cortex may result in a greater susceptibility to interference, which might lead to impairment in the networking process, as suggested by previous studies that have reported that the degree of impairment in relational reasoning is dependent on increasing memory load or number of distracters (Feredoes et al 2006;Krawczyk et al 2008). This would suggest that the prefrontal cortex supports the establishment of a highly integrated network of related information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The current findings indicate that the odors were not integrated into a relational network that enabled the flexible memory expression in the form of transitive inference. Damage to the prefrontal cortex may result in a greater susceptibility to interference, which might lead to impairment in the networking process, as suggested by previous studies that have reported that the degree of impairment in relational reasoning is dependent on increasing memory load or number of distracters (Feredoes et al 2006;Krawczyk et al 2008). This would suggest that the prefrontal cortex supports the establishment of a highly integrated network of related information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The first two pedagogical strategies reduce processing demands on learners. Dual task and cognitive neuropsychological methodologies have produced evidence that analogical reasoning imposes high processing demands on the working memory and central executive systems for two aspects of analogical reasoning: representing and integrating relevant relations, and controlling attention to competitive, irrelevant information (e.g., Cho, Holyoak & Cannon, 2007;Halford, 1993;Halford, Wilson & Phillips, 1998;Krawczyk, Morrison et al, 2008;Richland, Morrison & Holyoak, 2006). In mathematics education, therefore, the instructor must be cognizant of children's developing working memory capacity that limits their ability to hold and manipulate complex representations in mind (English & Halford, 1995).…”
Section: Strategies For Supporting Mathematical Instructional Analogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inhibition-related functions are known to play an important role in the development of cognitive abilities such as fluid intelligence (Burgess and Braver, 2010), reasoning (Krawczyk et al, 2008), and problem solving (Passolunghi et al, 1999). One type of inhibition, interference control, is the ability to select task-relevant information while simultaneously suppressing the influence of distracting information that conflicts with task demands, such as for example in Stroop tasks (Stroop, 1935).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%