2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distortions of Subjective Time Perception Within and Across Senses

Abstract: BackgroundThe ability to estimate the passage of time is of fundamental importance for perceptual and cognitive processes. One experience of time is the perception of duration, which is not isomorphic to physical duration and can be distorted by a number of factors. Yet, the critical features generating these perceptual shifts in subjective duration are not understood.Methodology/FindingsWe used prospective duration judgments within and across sensory modalities to examine the effect of stimulus predictability… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

21
221
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(248 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(118 reference statements)
21
221
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, a looming stimulus leads to time dilation, whereas the opposite effect is not observed for a receding stimulus. (e.g., Van Wassenhove et al, 2008;Van Wassenhove et al, 2011). These findings were hypothesized to result from potential modulations in both clock speed (multiplicative effects) and switch latency (additive effects), and therefore directly relate to and are complemented by the results presented here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For instance, a looming stimulus leads to time dilation, whereas the opposite effect is not observed for a receding stimulus. (e.g., Van Wassenhove et al, 2008;Van Wassenhove et al, 2011). These findings were hypothesized to result from potential modulations in both clock speed (multiplicative effects) and switch latency (additive effects), and therefore directly relate to and are complemented by the results presented here.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Previous research had shown that looming stimuli elicited dilation in perceived interval length but that receding stimuli did not (New & Scholl, 2009;van Wassenhove et al, 2008;Wittmann et al, 2010). However, this previous research only simulated motion using 2-D stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Looming signals of two-dimensional (2-D) stimuli (i.e., discs that expand in diameter) are associated with subjective time dilation, whereas receding signals (i.e., discs that contract in size) are not (New & Scholl, 2009;van Wassenhove et al, 2008;Wittmann, van Wassenhove, Craig, & Paulus, 2010). For example, Wittmann et al presented participants with trials consisting of three successive stationary stimuli at a standard duration, followed by a test stimulus that appeared to loom, recede, or remain stationary, followed by a standard stimulus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, significant correlations were still observed between RTs and P3 latency (R = 0.698, P \ 0.001) within the visual target group. Unlike both the auditory and somatosensory target conditions, difficulty in detecting the target event (V) did not significantly vary with the presence of multisensory background events (a, s, and as) (van Wassenhove et al 2008). It is possible that the combination of multisensory facilitation and inhibition cancelled one another out, thus resulting in a similar level of difficulty during working memory updating.…”
Section: Dynamic Characteristics Of Multisensory Facilitation and Inhmentioning
confidence: 88%