1997
DOI: 10.1021/ja971705c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distorted Square Planar Ni(II)−Chalcogenolate Carbonyl Complexes [Ni(CO)(SPh)n(SePh)3-n]-(n= 0, 1, 2):  Relevance to the Nickel Site in CO Dehydrogenases and [NiFeSe] Hydrogenase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(28 reference statements)
6
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All structures starting with either carefully chosen trigonal bipyramidal, or square pyramidal geometries, converge to four‐coordinate structures with the additional ligand (either CO or H 2 O) detached from the Ni center, with or without Grimme's D3 dispersion correction . Additionally, there have been several reports since the original work investigating this catalyst that have found crystal structures of square planar Ni(II), often serving as structural models of the same CODH enzyme, albeit often distorted . These observations support the suggestion that the iminothiolate ligand is indeed unique in making the Ni center softer than the usual Ni(II), thus, facilitating π‐backbonding to CO, yielding an interesting target for spectroscopic characterization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…All structures starting with either carefully chosen trigonal bipyramidal, or square pyramidal geometries, converge to four‐coordinate structures with the additional ligand (either CO or H 2 O) detached from the Ni center, with or without Grimme's D3 dispersion correction . Additionally, there have been several reports since the original work investigating this catalyst that have found crystal structures of square planar Ni(II), often serving as structural models of the same CODH enzyme, albeit often distorted . These observations support the suggestion that the iminothiolate ligand is indeed unique in making the Ni center softer than the usual Ni(II), thus, facilitating π‐backbonding to CO, yielding an interesting target for spectroscopic characterization.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The best fit of the Se EXAFS data for both HDR samples is a model that contains one Se–C bond (at 1.98 Å) and one Se–Fe interaction at ∼2.4 Å (Table 1, fits 10, 13). The Cambridge Structural Database (Wavefunction, Inc.) was searched for Fe–Se–C fragments, from which a chemically reasonable average Se–Fe bond distance of 2.42 ± 0.02 Å was found [10–16], consistent with our determination of 2.41 Å for HDR + CoM–SeH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…d Values in square brackets were fixed during optimization. 11,14). Apparently, Se-Se and Se-Fe scattering have sufficiently similar phase that they are difficult to distinguish a priori.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fe(1)-C(3) bond [1.96(4) and 1.92(5) Å ] is elongated with respect to a pure terminal Fe II -alkylidene, revealing a vinyl character [52][53][54][55]. The Fe(1)-Se(1) distance [2.391(8) and 2.357(9) Å ] is in keeping with previously reported iron(II)-selenide bonds [56][57][58][59][60]. The perfectly planar five-membered ring [mean deviation from the Fe(1)-Se(1)-C(1)-C(2)-C(3) least-squares plane 0.0094 and 0.0409 Å ] can be described as a zwitterionic ferra-selenophene-iminium, and to the best of our knowledge is unprecedented in organometallic chemistry.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Compoundssupporting
confidence: 86%