2008
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing institutional identification from academic goal pursuit: Interactive effects of ethnic identification and race-based rejection sensitivity.

Abstract: We examined the interactive effects of ethnic identification (EI) and race-based rejection sensitivity (RS-race) on institutional outcomes among African American college students. We distinguished between effects on institutional identification on the one hand and academic goal pursuit (e.g., staying in school, grade point average [GPA]) on the other. Supporting the utility of this distinction, we found that EI and RS-race interacted to predict these outcomes differently. Higher EI in combination with higher R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
1
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mere prospect of an intergroup exchange often triggers debilitating cognitions ( Plant, Butz, & Tartakovsky, ) and expectations of adverse outcomes (Mallett, Wilson, & Gilbert, ), including expectations of communication uncertainty (Plant & Devine, ), interpersonal rejection (Mendoza‐Denton, Pietrzak, & Downey, ), or indifference (Al Ramiah et al, ; Shelton & Richeson, ), impending threats to cherished values (Stephan & Stephan, ) or even physical threats (Mallan, Sax, & Lipp, ; for discussions of this literature's complexities, see Greenland, Xenias, & Maio, ; Paolini, Harris, et al, ; Stephan, ). As long as these anxieties and negative expectations readily come to mind when faced with realistic opportunities for contact, most people will opt to avoid contact.…”
Section: Understanding Contact Avoidance By Dissecting Negative Contamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mere prospect of an intergroup exchange often triggers debilitating cognitions ( Plant, Butz, & Tartakovsky, ) and expectations of adverse outcomes (Mallett, Wilson, & Gilbert, ), including expectations of communication uncertainty (Plant & Devine, ), interpersonal rejection (Mendoza‐Denton, Pietrzak, & Downey, ), or indifference (Al Ramiah et al, ; Shelton & Richeson, ), impending threats to cherished values (Stephan & Stephan, ) or even physical threats (Mallan, Sax, & Lipp, ; for discussions of this literature's complexities, see Greenland, Xenias, & Maio, ; Paolini, Harris, et al, ; Stephan, ). As long as these anxieties and negative expectations readily come to mind when faced with realistic opportunities for contact, most people will opt to avoid contact.…”
Section: Understanding Contact Avoidance By Dissecting Negative Contamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rovai, 2009, p. 29) Three barriers were found in this subcategory: Mexicanoriented acculturation, private regard (Gonzalez et al, 2013), and race-based rejection sensitivity (Mendoza-Denton, Pietrzak, & Downey, 2008).…”
Section: Plans For Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more individuals expect to be the target of prejudice or to be rejected, the more negative their experience of intergroup interactions (Shelton, Richeson, & Salvatore, 2005). These expectations have also been found to affect their behavior in the interaction (Butz & Plant, 2006), and their feelings of belonging in institutions dominated by the majority group (Mendoza‐Denton et al, 2002; Mendoza‐Denton, Pietrzak, & Downey, 2008).…”
Section: Barriers To Intergroup Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%