2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2015.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing human and climate influences on streamflow changes in Luan River basin in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the previous studies of the HRB, climate and LU have been identified as the primary factors responsible for the decrease in runoff [37,38,42,43]. Considering the in situ conditions of the mountainous region of the HRB, which is less disturbed by human activities than elsewhere in the basin, the following environmental factors were selected as the influencing factors: precipitation, air temperature, proportion of forest, farmland, and grass, and the leaf area index (LAI) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the previous studies of the HRB, climate and LU have been identified as the primary factors responsible for the decrease in runoff [37,38,42,43]. Considering the in situ conditions of the mountainous region of the HRB, which is less disturbed by human activities than elsewhere in the basin, the following environmental factors were selected as the influencing factors: precipitation, air temperature, proportion of forest, farmland, and grass, and the leaf area index (LAI) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Environmental Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in runoff from the headstream in mountainous areas has limited the downstream surface flow in the HRB [39][40][41]. Previous studies have focused mainly on the entire HRB and have identified the factors that influence runoff variation [38,[42][43][44], but they have paid less attention to the variational relative contributions of these factors which have influence on surface runoff over time. Such studies would improve our understanding of the dynamic relationships between surface runoff and environmental factors, as well as the management of complex water resource challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assumption of linearity represents a limitation of double‐mass analysis because when gradual disturbances overlap, it is difficult to identify the undisturbed state of a system (Glenn‐Lewin, Peet, & Veblen, ; Temperli, Bugmann, & Elkin, ). Time series analysis now features methods such as change point analysis (Hawkins, Qiu, & Kang, ; Hawkins & Zamba, ; Wang, Chen, & Yu, ) to identify the timing of significant change in the location and scale of a time series rather than relying on a second variable like the double‐mass analysis and has been applied in various climate and hydrological studies (Yang, Chen, Xu, & Zhang, ; Huang, Xia, Guo, & Yang, ; Matsuyama, Marengo, Obregon, & Nobre, ; Vivès & Jones, ; Caldwell et al, ). The simultaneous effect of climate variability on streamflow can be filtered with a climate elasticity model (CEM; Schaake, ; Sankarasubramanian, Vogel, & Limbrunner, ) that expresses the rate of streamflow change as the rate of change of a set of climate parameters, such as precipitation and temperature (Fu, Charles, & Chiew, ) or precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Hao et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These change factors include the increasing global surface temperature and significant local impacts such as high-magnitude floods, prolonged droughts, flow variability, temperature rise, and decreased rainfall [12][13][14]. As such, there is a need to change the perception of climate change and its uncertainty and vulnerability since its weaknesses should be prioritized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%