“…The assumption of linearity represents a limitation of double‐mass analysis because when gradual disturbances overlap, it is difficult to identify the undisturbed state of a system (Glenn‐Lewin, Peet, & Veblen, ; Temperli, Bugmann, & Elkin, ). Time series analysis now features methods such as change point analysis (Hawkins, Qiu, & Kang, ; Hawkins & Zamba, ; Wang, Chen, & Yu, ) to identify the timing of significant change in the location and scale of a time series rather than relying on a second variable like the double‐mass analysis and has been applied in various climate and hydrological studies (Yang, Chen, Xu, & Zhang, ; Huang, Xia, Guo, & Yang, ; Matsuyama, Marengo, Obregon, & Nobre, ; Vivès & Jones, ; Caldwell et al, ). The simultaneous effect of climate variability on streamflow can be filtered with a climate elasticity model (CEM; Schaake, ; Sankarasubramanian, Vogel, & Limbrunner, ) that expresses the rate of streamflow change as the rate of change of a set of climate parameters, such as precipitation and temperature (Fu, Charles, & Chiew, ) or precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Hao et al, ).…”