2022
DOI: 10.1111/gbi.12506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing cellular from abiotic spheroidal microstructures in the ca. 3.4 Ga Strelley Pool Formation

Abstract: The morphogenesis of most carbonaceous microstructures that resemble microfossils in Archean (4-2.5 Ga old) rocks remains debated. The associated carbonaceous matter may even-in some cases-derive from abiotic organic molecules. Mineral growths associated with organic matter migration may mimic microbial cells, some anatomical features, and known microfossils-in particular those with simple spheroid shapes.Here, spheroid microstructures from a chert of the ca. 3.4 Ga Strelley Pool Formation (SPF) of the Pilbara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having said this, there is some coarse similarity between the cell‐like spheres within the SA microfossils and spheroidal structures recently described from the c. 3.4 Ga Strelley Pool Formation (SPF; Type 4 structures of Coutant et al, 2022), in that both consist of a sub‐spherical morphology with an inner vesicle (cell) that is surrounded by an outer wall (sheath). However, there are prominent differences in overall colony/cluster appearance and configuration between these two examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Having said this, there is some coarse similarity between the cell‐like spheres within the SA microfossils and spheroidal structures recently described from the c. 3.4 Ga Strelley Pool Formation (SPF; Type 4 structures of Coutant et al, 2022), in that both consist of a sub‐spherical morphology with an inner vesicle (cell) that is surrounded by an outer wall (sheath). However, there are prominent differences in overall colony/cluster appearance and configuration between these two examples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, there are prominent differences in overall colony/cluster appearance and configuration between these two examples. Specifically, the cell‐like spheres of the SA microfossils are consistently aggregated into an overall spherical, colonial morphology of regular size and shape, with tens of aggregates observed across multiple thin sections (Figures 1–3), whereas the spheroidal structures of the SPF were observed within only one cluster, and this had a contorted, non‐uniform overall shape (Figure S17c, left side; Coutant et al, 2022). Moreover, the SPF spheroidal structures are loosely arranged and sit among a thick concentration of nanoparticulate OM that is distributed both in and around the structures (Figure S17c, middle and right side), which may suggest cluster formation via adhesion of individual cells rather than cell division (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations