Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.195214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing between tunneling and injection regimes of ferromagnet/organic semiconductor/ferromagnet junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
84
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
8
84
1
Order By: Relevance
“…X-ray diffraction measurements showed that the C 60 layers of different thickness were structurally amorphous. The C 60 layer thickness in our devices was far greater than the tunnelling barrier limit that has been reported thus far [7][8][9][10][11][12]35 . Thus, the SDT within the C 60 layer via hopping between localized neighbouring states was mainly considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…X-ray diffraction measurements showed that the C 60 layers of different thickness were structurally amorphous. The C 60 layer thickness in our devices was far greater than the tunnelling barrier limit that has been reported thus far [7][8][9][10][11][12]35 . Thus, the SDT within the C 60 layer via hopping between localized neighbouring states was mainly considered.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Clearly, it is also possible to change the FM-OSC coupling by the use of thin interfacial layers. The effect of a tunnel barrier between the metal and the OSC on the functionality of a spin-valve device has proven to be critical for spin-polarized tunneling [33,37,38,[46][47][48][49]. Dediu and coworkers have demonstrated that the quality of the metalorganic interfaces can be improved by inserting an Al 2 O 3 layer on top of the organic material, prior to growing the top ferromagnetic electrode [50].…”
Section: Magnetoresistance In Organic Spin Valvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To harness the electron spin in organics for spintronic applications, it is mandatory to elucidate the MR, which in turn requires that the device resistance of the OSVs be adequately accounted for. While the large thickness of the organic film in an OSV precludes a direct tunnelling between the electrodes, the observed I-V characteristic is also incomprehensible in terms of electron injection into the organic's lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) or hole injection into the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), as commonly assumed in literature [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] . The two electrodes, labelled 1 and 2, in an OSV have different Schottky barriers, qf 1 oqf 2 (q ÂŒ |e| is the electron charge), which would give rise to a built-in potential, V bu ÂŒ f 2 À f 1 , in an undoped organic film at zero bias.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The OSVs with a pronounced MR are usually vertical structures [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] , with the top electrode grown after the deposition of the organic. Lateral ferromagnet-organic-ferromagnet devices, where both electrodes are fabricated before the deposition of the organic, however, are much more resistive and seldom exhibit any spin-valve effect 19 .…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation