2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011jb008308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing between stress-induced and structural anisotropy at Mount Ruapehu volcano, New Zealand

Abstract: [1] We have created a benchmark of spatial variations in shear wave anisotropy around Mount Ruapehu, New Zealand, against which to measure future temporal changes. Anisotropy in the crust is often assumed to be caused by stress-aligned microcracks, and the polarization of the fast quasi-shear wave (f) is thus interpreted to indicate the direction of maximum horizontal stress, but can also be due to aligned minerals or macroscopic fractures. Changes in seismic anisotropy have been observed following a major eru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The splitting polarizations at these stations may be affected more by local fracture systems than by the regional stresses. The existence of both stress‐controlled anisotropy and structurally controlled anisotropy in the close proximity to each other is comparable with anisotropic structure obtained in the upper crust of the West Bohemia/Vogtland seismically active area [ Vavryčuk , ; Vavryčuk and Boušková , ] or Mount Ruapehu Volcano [ Johnson et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The splitting polarizations at these stations may be affected more by local fracture systems than by the regional stresses. The existence of both stress‐controlled anisotropy and structurally controlled anisotropy in the close proximity to each other is comparable with anisotropic structure obtained in the upper crust of the West Bohemia/Vogtland seismically active area [ Vavryčuk , ; Vavryčuk and Boušková , ] or Mount Ruapehu Volcano [ Johnson et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often measurements at a single station may be consistent for the same earthquake location but vary for different earthquake locations (Johnson et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Yet when splitting measurements are averaged regionally, the measurements should align with the maximum horizontal stress (Savage et al, ), although sometimes they are more consistent with regional structures or with faulting (Balfour et al, ; Zinke & Zoback, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies using automatic splitting measurements were limited in time and space by the need to provide a shear wave ( S ) arrival time, which was done by manually picking each record. The most comprehensive spatial analysis of anisotropy in the region was carried out by Johnson et al []. They used the MFAST program [ Savage et al , ] to perform shear wave splitting measurements for local events recorded at 34 seismometers deployed around Mount Ruapehu in 2008 to provide background values against which changes could be measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%