2018
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing between northern salt marsh and western harvest mice

Abstract: The northern subspecies of the salt marsh harvest mouse (Reithrodontomys raviventris halicoetes) is morphologically similar to the western harvest mouse (R. megalotis) with which it co-occurs in the Suisun Marsh, California, USA, and therefore they are difficult to distinguish in the field. The salt marsh harvest mouse is a federal and California state-listed endangered species, whereas the western harvest mouse has no special status. Thus, our objective was to identify the most effective field metrics that di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown (2003) identified mice from Suisun Marsh with mtDNA, and developed dichotomous keys to differentiate SMHM and WHM based on external characters. Comprehensive extensions of Brown's (2003) work have resulted in more refined statistical models to use the most important characteristics to differentiate between species (Sustaita et al 2018). Although promising, these models remain limited to the northern sub-species, and even there they are unable to classify young and small harvest mice.…”
Section: Taxonomy and Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brown (2003) identified mice from Suisun Marsh with mtDNA, and developed dichotomous keys to differentiate SMHM and WHM based on external characters. Comprehensive extensions of Brown's (2003) work have resulted in more refined statistical models to use the most important characteristics to differentiate between species (Sustaita et al 2018). Although promising, these models remain limited to the northern sub-species, and even there they are unable to classify young and small harvest mice.…”
Section: Taxonomy and Geneticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C; Zetterquist ; Botti et al ; Shellhammer et al , ; Sustaita et al ; Smith et al ), though these areas were frequently considered marginal when compared to tidal wetlands dominated by pickleweed (Zetterquist , Botti et al , Shellhammer et al ). Additionally, to some unknown extent, some of our understanding, or misunderstanding, of habitat preferences by salt marsh harvest mice may reflect substantial challenges in field identification of sympatric harvest mice (Statham et al , Sustaita et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of genetic species identification revealed that morphological assignment methods were inadequate in the range of the southern SMHM, where only ~50% were correctly identified (Statham et al 2016). This was the case regardless of whether mice were being identified using the tail scoring method (Shellhammer 1984; USFWS and others), or the multiple logistic regression (Sustaita et al, 2018;CDFW). This finding essentially invalidated cur-rent morphological methods for the identification of harvest mice species within the range of the southern SMHM, leaving the identification reliant solely on genetic analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental to monitoring, management, and conservation of endangered species is the ability to identify them in the field. Correct identification is essential for accurate characterization of the species' range, habitat, abundance, demography, population trends, and dietary requirements (Smith et al 2018;Sustaita et al 2018;Quinn et al 2019;Statham et al 2019). Erroneous identification leads to a false characterization of these parameters, which in turn invalidates conservation assessments and other scientific conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation