2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2009.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing between live and dead standing tree biomass on the North Rim of Grand Canyon National Park, USA using small-footprint lidar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
90
2
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
90
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…From each point cloud data, the various height distribution related features were calculated and used as predictors in the regression for developing prediction models because they have been proved to be effective in predicting forest attributes [4,[37][38][39]. Most of the features were calculated from normalized points above the 2 m threshold.…”
Section: Plot Feature Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From each point cloud data, the various height distribution related features were calculated and used as predictors in the regression for developing prediction models because they have been proved to be effective in predicting forest attributes [4,[37][38][39]. Most of the features were calculated from normalized points above the 2 m threshold.…”
Section: Plot Feature Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because these data have not been collected on a systematic, routine basis, they have limited use for widespread forest monitoring. Data from lidar sensors have great potential for forest monitoring because of their highly relevant quality (Kim et al, 2009), but repeated lidar coverage is only now becoming available . Consequently, for most of the Earth's forests, lidar will remain a sampling and target-of-opportunity instrument for the foreseeable future owing to cost and the current lack of a suitable space-based platform.…”
Section: Sensor Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relevance of this type of variables was reported in forest studies to estimate tree volume and biomass by plots (Naesset, 2004;Li et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2009). In our study it was observed a trend in which the higher values of CH 1.5-3.5 , the larger values of volume were estimated.…”
Section: Models For Tree Volume Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%