2007
DOI: 10.1177/0146167206296951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Between Learning and Motivation in Behavioral Tests of the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality

Abstract: According to Gray's (1973) Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST), a Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and a Behavioral Activation System (BAS) mediate effects of goal conflict and reward on behavior. BIS functioning has been linked with individual differences in trait anxiety and BAS functioning with individual differences in trait impulsivity. In this article, it is argued that behavioral outputs of the BIS and BAS can be distinguished in terms of learning and motivation processes and that these can be oper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
27
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, slower and more gradual learning in high-performing older individuals may reflect a habitual learning strategy that relies on repeated experiences of stimulus-reward contingencies (Daw et al, 2011). The results of the correlational analysis nicely support this view by showing that in YA learning to predict future reward depends on fluid abilities (McClure et al, 2004;Shamosh et al, 2008), whereas in OA enhanced reward sensitivity is associated with better learning from future reward (Smillie et al, 2007).…”
Section: Age-related and Individual Differences In Learning To Predicmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In contrast, slower and more gradual learning in high-performing older individuals may reflect a habitual learning strategy that relies on repeated experiences of stimulus-reward contingencies (Daw et al, 2011). The results of the correlational analysis nicely support this view by showing that in YA learning to predict future reward depends on fluid abilities (McClure et al, 2004;Shamosh et al, 2008), whereas in OA enhanced reward sensitivity is associated with better learning from future reward (Smillie et al, 2007).…”
Section: Age-related and Individual Differences In Learning To Predicmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…When information sampling is free, increased sensitivity to potential global losses would lead to greater information sampling to avoid those losses; but when information sampling is costly, avoidance of losses at the local level could antagonise avoidance of losses at the global level. Previous studies have associated BIS scores with enhanced sensitivity to losses and threat (Perkins et al, 2010; Field, 2006; Smillie et al, 2007). The current study extends these findings to a setting involving decision-making under conflict and suggests that the cost of information sampling moderates the influence of anxiety on decision-making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The BAS system is associated with approach motivation, especially in the context of reward (Elliot and Thrash 2002;Smillie et al 2007), so that higher BAS scores are expected to lead to increased impulsivity and risk. In typical development, age is also positively correlated with sensitivity to reward (Steinberg et al 2009), as in this sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%