2023
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-29689-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing and Recovering Generalized Linearized Reed–Solomon Codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new approach is to consider the sum-rank metric which covers both the Hamming and the rank metric as special cases. Even though the gain in terms of key size might not be as large as for the rank metric, it is reasonable to hope that rank-metric attacks cannot be adapted to the sum-rank-metric case [21] and the corresponding systems will remain secure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new approach is to consider the sum-rank metric which covers both the Hamming and the rank metric as special cases. Even though the gain in terms of key size might not be as large as for the rank metric, it is reasonable to hope that rank-metric attacks cannot be adapted to the sum-rank-metric case [21] and the corresponding systems will remain secure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the rank metric the problem of decoding beyond the unique decoding radius was addressed in [17] for Gabidulin codes. Known structural attacks for McEliece-like cryptosystem in the Hamming and Rank metric [18]- [20] have been generalized to the sum-rank metric [21]. This raises the question if the sum-rank metric can be adapted to other cryptosystems that are based on the hardness of decoding beyond the unique decoding radius, such as [22]- [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%