2009
DOI: 10.1175/2008jcli2573.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishing Aerosol Impacts on Climate over the Past Century

Abstract: • C from the DE, IE, and BAE. Ice and snow cover increased 1.0% from the IE and decreased 0.3% from the BAE. These changes were a factor of 4 larger in the Arctic. Global cloud cover increased by 0.5% from the IE.Net aerosol cooling effects are about half as large as the GHG warming, and their combined climate effects are smaller than the sum of their individual effects. Increasing GHG's did not affect the IE impact on cloud cover, however they decreased aerosol effects on SAT by 20% and on snow/ice cover by 5… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
135
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
8
135
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimate the AIE by taking the difference in net cloud radiative forcing between time periods (Figure 2) for the simulations with ACI and the simulations without. The past AIE is −2.0 Wm −2 , higher than previous GISS model estimates (Menon et al, 2008a;Koch et al, 2009) and estimates based on constraints from the temperature record using a parameterized AIE treatment in a similar version of the GISS model (Hansen et al, 2005). However, changes in CDNC in the Koch et al (2009) simulations are about half of that obtained in this study since the Koch et al study used a different set of emissions that had a lower sulfate burden change.…”
Section: Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing and Aiecontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimate the AIE by taking the difference in net cloud radiative forcing between time periods (Figure 2) for the simulations with ACI and the simulations without. The past AIE is −2.0 Wm −2 , higher than previous GISS model estimates (Menon et al, 2008a;Koch et al, 2009) and estimates based on constraints from the temperature record using a parameterized AIE treatment in a similar version of the GISS model (Hansen et al, 2005). However, changes in CDNC in the Koch et al (2009) simulations are about half of that obtained in this study since the Koch et al study used a different set of emissions that had a lower sulfate burden change.…”
Section: Aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing and Aiecontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…As expected CC increased from PI to PD due to ACI. Without including aerosol-induced changes to clouds, CC decreases between PD and PI, due to climate-related changes that tend to decrease CC with increased GHG warming, as also found by Koch et al (2009). Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of the aerosol-induced changes in cloud properties between PD-PI and 2050-PD.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2 in Warren and Wiscombe (1995). The resulting decrease in snow albedo averaged over the Arctic is 0.4 % in winter and 0.8 % in spring 2008 (0.6 % for spring [2007][2008][2009]), lower than previous estimates of 1.1-4.7 % Koch et al, 2009a). By convolving this result with the GEOS-5 incoming solar radiation at the surface we deduce a surface radiative forcing over the Arctic ( …”
Section: Bc Deposition In the Arctic And Implications For Radiative Fmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The vertical distribution of aerosols has important implications for radiative forcing (Koch et al, 2009a). Two coordinated aircraft campaigns with carbonaceous aerosol measurements were conducted in April 2008 out of Fairbanks, Alaska: the NASA Arctic Research of the Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) and the NOAA Aerosol, Radiation and Cloud Processes affecting Arctic Climate (ARCPAC) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Koch et al (2009) summarized cryosphere forcing estimates, which range from +0.01 to +0.16 W m −2 and vary widely with the method of parameterization and the reference value of emission. However, some of these estimates use different emission rates and some are less physically based.…”
Section: Total Cryosphere Forcingmentioning
confidence: 99%