2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02393219
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguished varieties

Abstract: IntroductionIn this paper, we shall be looking at a special class of bordered (algebraic) varieties that are contained in the bidisk D 2 in C 2. Condition (0.2) means that the variety exits the bidisk through the distinguished boundary of the bidisk, the torus. We shall use OV to denote the set given by (0.2): topologically, it is the boundary of V within Zp, the zero set of p, rather than in all of C 2. We shall always assume that p is chosen to be minimal, i.e. so that no irreducible component of Zp is disjo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
186
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
11
186
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a solvable N -Pick problem on D n denote by V the set of points in D n on which all the interpolating functions have the same value. This set is usually a proper subset of D n and the argument of Agler and McCarthy [5] shows that V is a variety, what justifies its name. Agler and McCarthy [4] described uniqueness varieties for the three-Pick problem in D 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having a solvable N -Pick problem on D n denote by V the set of points in D n on which all the interpolating functions have the same value. This set is usually a proper subset of D n and the argument of Agler and McCarthy [5] shows that V is a variety, what justifies its name. Agler and McCarthy [4] described uniqueness varieties for the three-Pick problem in D 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agler and McCarthy [4] described uniqueness varieties for the three-Pick problem in D 2 . In [5] they showed that any uniqueness variety contains a distinguished variety W (that is a variety of the form W = {(z, w) ∈ D 2 : p(z, w) = 0} for some polynomial p and such that W ∩ ∂(D 2 ) = W ∩ T 2 ) that contains each of nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We view this as an analogue of the celebrated work of Agler and M c Carthy on norm preserving extensions of functions on varieties to whole domains [1,2]. Additionally, since p totally determinesp, the dimension of the Zariski closure of the image of a free polynomial map can apparently go up, in contrast with the commutative case [12].…”
Section: Geometrymentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This means that Φ holizes Ω as a distinguished variety. (The fact that φ 1 and φ 2 satisfy an algebraic equation was proved by Fedorov by extending them to the Schottky double, but also follows from general arguments [3].) However, W. Rudin showed that if the connectivity of Ω is greater than one, then Φ cannot be one-to-one on ∂Ω [22].…”
Section: Pairs Of Blaschke Productsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These are called distinguished varieties (since they exit the disk through the distinguished boundary) and have been studied in [3] and [27]. One difficulty in the theory is proving that a particular pair of functions in a cofinite algebra generate the whole algebra.…”
Section: Theorem 12 (I) If H Is a Holomap From A Riemann Surface S Imentioning
confidence: 99%