2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2006.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishability quantification of fuzzy sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Rule refinement: once the Gaussians are obtained, rules are then generated. These rules undergo an optimization process which consists of merging the membership functions (fuzzy sets) using the Jaccard's similarity measure for type-2 FS's which is based on the analysis provided in [31]. Those exceeding a threshold are merged using an adapted formula for fusing univariate Gaussians like:…”
Section: B Rule Base Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Rule refinement: once the Gaussians are obtained, rules are then generated. These rules undergo an optimization process which consists of merging the membership functions (fuzzy sets) using the Jaccard's similarity measure for type-2 FS's which is based on the analysis provided in [31]. Those exceeding a threshold are merged using an adapted formula for fusing univariate Gaussians like:…”
Section: B Rule Base Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, granulation is hierarchical in nature.". The notions of similarity, equivalence, and indistinguishability relations have been well investigated with set-based approaches (Bittner & Stell, 2003;Chen & Yao, 2006;Hata & Mukaidono, 1999;Keet, 2007a;Mencar et al, 2007;Peters et al, 2002;Skowron & Peters, 2003;Yao, 2004). However, this set-based approach has issues that can be better addressed with mereology proper (Abelló et al, 2006;Bittner & Smith, 2003;Keet, 2008a).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One concerns the value or value range for each granule within a granulation hierarchy, such as km 2 and m 2 , and the other the precision of each specific level, or the refinement of measurements for the granule, such as "km 2 ± 1 m 2 " or "km 2 ± 1 cm 2 ", where the choice for m 2 or cm 2 is provided by the approximation space that covers both intended and enforced indistinguishability 2 . Examples of degrees of membership are properties such as colour shades, but this is rarely used as a criterion for granulation of universals (although it can be used as an indirect means [19], [20]).…”
Section: A Indiscernibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%