The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2011
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.84.022340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinguishability of hyperentangled Bell states by linear evolution and local projective measurement

Abstract: Measuring an entangled state of two particles is crucial to many quantum communication protocols. Yet Bellstate distinguishability using a finite apparatus obeying linear evolution and local measurement is theoretically limited. We extend known bounds for Bell-state distinguishability in one and two variables to the general case of entanglement in n two-state variables. We show that at most 2 n+1 − 1 classes out of 4 n hyper-Bell states can be distinguished with one copy of the input state. With two copies, co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This Equation relates the maximun number of distinguishable Bell-state classes of two photons, entangled in n dichotomic degrees of freedom, in experiments in which the two photons are not mixed at the device, with the number of ZPF inputs at the source of entanglement and inside the analyser. In the standard Hilbert space approach, given to the fact that the first detection event, which is produced in one of the 2 n detectors of the left (or right) area, does not give any information about the Bell-state of the two photons, the second detection event can discriminate to 2 n sets of Bell states [31]. From the WRHP approach, this quantity can be obtained by subtracting the total number of idle channels at the analyser, N ic , from the total number of ZPF sets of modes that are amplified at the source of hyperentanglement, N ZP F,S .…”
Section: Zpf and Complete Bsm In The Rome Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Equation relates the maximun number of distinguishable Bell-state classes of two photons, entangled in n dichotomic degrees of freedom, in experiments in which the two photons are not mixed at the device, with the number of ZPF inputs at the source of entanglement and inside the analyser. In the standard Hilbert space approach, given to the fact that the first detection event, which is produced in one of the 2 n detectors of the left (or right) area, does not give any information about the Bell-state of the two photons, the second detection event can discriminate to 2 n sets of Bell states [31]. From the WRHP approach, this quantity can be obtained by subtracting the total number of idle channels at the analyser, N ic , from the total number of ZPF sets of modes that are amplified at the source of hyperentanglement, N ZP F,S .…”
Section: Zpf and Complete Bsm In The Rome Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements required for QT are probabilistic when using linear optics; this problem is worsened when teleporting higher-dimensional states. Because the percentage of the total higher-dimensional Bell states discriminated with linear optics detection decreases as dimension increases, QT of states d42 is impossible to do with perfect fidelity without nonlinear interactions 31,32 . Furthermore, although RSP can be performed deterministically for any state dimension, the complexity of the measurement increases quadratically with the state dimension: a d-dimensional state with 2d-2 state parameters requires a POVM with d 2 outputs and detectors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, completely analysis of the hyperentangled Bell-state is still a huge challenge in high-capacity quantum information processing. Considering that completely HBSA cannot be accomplished only with linear optical elements [39,40], researchers have gradually introduced nonlinear media [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] to assist complete HBSA. In 2010, Sheng et al [41] firstly presented a way to completely distinguish the 16 hyperentangled Bell states completely with cross-Kerr nonlinearity, and discussed its application in quantum hyperteleportation and hyperentanglement swapping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%