2007
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctive Interactions at Multiple Site 2 Subsites by Allele-Specific Rat and Mouse Ly49 Determine Functional Binding and Class I MHC Specificity

Abstract: Rodent Ly49 exhibit allele-specific MHC I recognition, yet the interaction site, site 2, encompassing the area below the MHC peptide-binding groove, the α3 domain, and associated β2 microglobulin, is highly conserved among rat and mouse MHC I alleles. We previously demonstrated that allele-specific Ly49 recognition can be affected by polymorphisms specifically in the peptide anchor-binding and supertype-defining B pocket of MHC I, possibly through differential conformations assumed by solvent-exposed interacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our analysis was limited to three different peptides because of limitations in the choice of P2 anchor residues that can be expected to stabilize RT1-A1 c , it shows the dramatic differences in Ly49i2 recognition that can result from just a single amino acid difference in the bound peptide at an anchor position, which is not explained by a difference in MHC stability or level of peptide occupancy. Previously, we suggested that Ly49i2 recognition of RT1-A1 c may be influenced by the supertype family of the MHC-I (13,30). Our demonstration of the importance of the identity of P2 residues, Pro or Val (which are anchor residues of the HLA-B7 supertype), for Ly49i2 recognition is consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: A1supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although our analysis was limited to three different peptides because of limitations in the choice of P2 anchor residues that can be expected to stabilize RT1-A1 c , it shows the dramatic differences in Ly49i2 recognition that can result from just a single amino acid difference in the bound peptide at an anchor position, which is not explained by a difference in MHC stability or level of peptide occupancy. Previously, we suggested that Ly49i2 recognition of RT1-A1 c may be influenced by the supertype family of the MHC-I (13,30). Our demonstration of the importance of the identity of P2 residues, Pro or Val (which are anchor residues of the HLA-B7 supertype), for Ly49i2 recognition is consistent with this possibility.…”
Section: A1supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In both cases, we would expect changes in the B-pocket conformation relative to that with Pro or Val bound either by fitting a larger than preferred residue or remaining vacant. Differences in B-pocket conformation may be transmitted through the floor of the peptide binding groove, particularly the b1 strand, influencing the conformation of solventexposed RT1-A1 c residues extending below the groove such as Arg6 and Phe8, which have been demonstrated to play a role in Ly49i2 interaction (30), and/or possibly influencing contacts with associated b 2 m and therefore its orientation. RT1-A1 c has three b1 strand residues (Arg6, Phe8, and Asp9) that have distinct van der Waals interactions with b 2 m residues Phe56, Ser57, and Lys58, which are not found in RT1 , and this disrupted Ly49i2 recognition, despite this mutant maintaining the correct peptide P2 anchor residue, Pro or Val, in bound peptides (13).…”
Section: A1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, inhibitory KIR3DL1*002, due to a change at residue 238 in one of the extracellular domains, yields stronger levels of inhibition as compared to KIR3DL1*007 when triggered by its HLA-Bw4 ligand (23). Moreover, polymorphic residues affecting the affinity between KIR and its HLA ligands are likely to result in variable degrees of NK licensing and, therefore, effector capability, a phenomenon which has been studied for Ly49A, the murine functional analog of KIR (24, 25). Finally, variation in the KIR extracellular domains has also been demonstrated to affect the levels of surface localization of certain allelic products and, in the case of KIR2DL2*004, the retention of an immature, and likely nonfunctional, isoform within the cytoplasm (26).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Site 2 lacks polymorphic cI residues, providing no explanation for the cI selectivity of Ly49s, and leading to site 1 being originally favored as the principal binding site (12,13). However, most (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19), but not all (13,20,21), subsequent mutagenic analyses favored site 2 as the physiological binding site for Ly49s. More recently, the structure of a mutant form of Ly49C in complex with K b revealed a third binding mode in which the Ly49 homodimer adopts a more open dimerization state and contains an additional a helical region in the middle of loop 3, allowing interactions with a slightly different site underneath the peptide-binding groove (site 3) via a single monomer unit (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%