2000
DOI: 10.1093/clipsy.7.2.167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinctive features of short-term psychodynamic-interpersonal psychotherapy: A review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature.

Abstract: The present article is a review of the comparative psychotherapy process literature. It is an effort to delineate techniques and processes that distinguish two prominent forms of treatment. Seven interventions stood out as distinguishing psychodynamic‐interpersonal therapy from cognitive‐behavioral treatment: (1) a focus on affect and the expression of patients’ emotions; (2) an exploration of patients’ attempts to avoid topics or engage in activities that hinder the progress of therapy; (3) the identification… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
275
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 289 publications
(291 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
11
275
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…To help dispel possible myths and facilitate greater understanding of psychodynamic practice, in this section I review core features of contemporary psychodynamic technique. Blagys and Hilsenroth (2000) conducted a search of the PsycLit database to identify empirical studies that compared the process and technique of manualized psychodynamic therapy with that of manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Seven features reliably distinguished psychodynamic therapy from other therapies, as determined by empirical examination of actual session recordings and transcripts (note that the features listed below concern process and technique only, not underlying principles that inform these techniques; for a discussion of concepts and principles, see Gabbard, 2004;McWilliams, 2004;Shedler, 2006a):…”
Section: Distinctive Features Of Psychodynamic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help dispel possible myths and facilitate greater understanding of psychodynamic practice, in this section I review core features of contemporary psychodynamic technique. Blagys and Hilsenroth (2000) conducted a search of the PsycLit database to identify empirical studies that compared the process and technique of manualized psychodynamic therapy with that of manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Seven features reliably distinguished psychodynamic therapy from other therapies, as determined by empirical examination of actual session recordings and transcripts (note that the features listed below concern process and technique only, not underlying principles that inform these techniques; for a discussion of concepts and principles, see Gabbard, 2004;McWilliams, 2004;Shedler, 2006a):…”
Section: Distinctive Features Of Psychodynamic Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increased use of exploration is associated with more positive relationship ratings. 30,41,[50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] …”
Section: Exploration and Reflectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 However, the basic elements of the patient-therapist relationship remain the same for most therapies. Even in computerised therapies patients still form strong attachments to the therapy.…”
Section: Type Of Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therapist focus on encouraging the expression and experiencing of feelings is recognized as a characteristic feature of Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapies (STPP) (Blagys & Hilsenroth, 2000). Indeed, a meta-analysis including 10 STPP studies found that therapist facilitation of affect was positively associated with treatment improvement (Diener, Hilsenroth, & Weinberger, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%