2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2009.03.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinction of Push,pull effect and steric hindrance in disubstituted alkynes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and 3. [17] Absorptions at about 2200 and 2150 cm À1 in the IR spectra were characteristic of the CC triple bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…and 3. [17] Absorptions at about 2200 and 2150 cm À1 in the IR spectra were characteristic of the CC triple bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In terminal fragments, monomeric compounds (c. f. compound 4 and ref. [17 -19]) or terminal alkynes [24,25] the difference is usually much smaller. The characteristic shifts δ ( 1 H) of the bridging hydride anions in compounds 2 and 3 are found between δ = 3 and 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of reaction pathways is determined by several factors that include, the electrophile–nucleophile pair, the nature of the nucleophile, the leaving group ability of the nucleofuge, the permanent group electrofugality, solvent effects and the electrophilicity of the C = X group . The latter is not yet completely understood and its effect on the reaction mechanism has been discussed on the basis of experimental evidence using a qualitative push–pull effect at the C = X group (see Scheme ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%