2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-00959-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Distinct structure and gating mechanism in diverse NMDA receptors with GluN2C and GluN2D subunits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under apo conditions, we primarily observe a high FRET state of 0.97 which correlates to a FRET distance of approximately 29 Å. This distance agrees with the published cryo-EM structure of the GluN1/GluN2D receptor bound by glycine and competitive antagonist CPP, where the distance between Phe554 on both GluN1 subunits is approximately 31 Å 29 . This finding is consistent with the GluN1 transmembrane segments in the GluN1/GluN2D receptor being tightly packed and likely representing the closed, inactive channel state of the receptor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under apo conditions, we primarily observe a high FRET state of 0.97 which correlates to a FRET distance of approximately 29 Å. This distance agrees with the published cryo-EM structure of the GluN1/GluN2D receptor bound by glycine and competitive antagonist CPP, where the distance between Phe554 on both GluN1 subunits is approximately 31 Å 29 . This finding is consistent with the GluN1 transmembrane segments in the GluN1/GluN2D receptor being tightly packed and likely representing the closed, inactive channel state of the receptor.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Amino-terminal domain conformations dictate differences in receptor activation 22, 50 . Decoupling of the amino-terminal domain upon antagonist or inhibitor binding correlates with lower activity of GluN1/GluN2A and GluN1/GluN2B receptors 29, 51 . To test if a similar shift in conformational landscape underlies lower activity of the GluN1/GluN2D receptor, we studied distances across the GluN2 subunit amino-terminal domain in GluN2D- and GluN2A-containing receptors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the low P o GluN2D, the fully agonist-bound receptor exhibits a super-compact NTD conformation, also observed recently in structural studies. 38,39 Our results suggest that distinct occupancy of three common classes of conformations (splayed, compact, and super-compact) in apo, partially, and fully liganded conformations in different receptor subtypes gives rise to their distinct properties (Fig. 5A).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…24,[30][31][32]22 Structural studies have transformed our understanding of NMDAR conformation by capturing each diheterotetrameric subtype at high resolution. 3,4,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Though distinct conformations have been observed in different subtypes and in different ligand conditions, it remains difficult to understand how subtype-specific gating emerges without observing the conformations adopted in each subtype in the resting state and with glycine or glutamate alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%