Abstract:Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a major factor in tumor-host interactions, plays a critical role in the aberrant hematopoiesis observed in cancer-bearing hosts. To dissect the roles of VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-1 and VEGFR-2 in cancer-associated hematopoiesis in vivo, we selectively stimulated VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 by continuous infusion of receptor-specific ligands or selective blockade with VEGF receptor-specific antibodies in mice infused with recombinant VEGF at levels observed in tumor-bearing animal… Show more
“…24 In mouse model of chronic infusion of VEGF, VEGFR2 signaling significantly inhibited thymic T-cell development and decreased total number of splenic T cells, whereas VEGFR1 signaling contributed to the mobilization of T cells such as T precursors from the bone marrow and T cells from thymus to spleen. 38 Furthermore, the treatment of neutralizing anti-VEGFR1 Ab and exogenous VEGF did not affect the suppressive function of CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cell. However, VEGFR1 would be involved in the migration of these cells and cause cleavage of IL-2 receptor a (CD25) from the surface of activated T cells through the induction of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) under a certain environment such as VEGF or a ligand-enriched environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEGF and VEGFR have profound effects on both developmental hematopoiesis and pathologic conditions. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] We first investigated the expression level of VEGFR1 in the murine thymocytes and T cells. We observed DN, DP, and SP (CD4 and CD8) thymocytes expressed VEGFR1.…”
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a specialized subpopulation of T cells that control the immune response and thereby maintain immune system homeostasis and tolerance to self-antigens. Many subsets of CD4 1 Tregs have been identified, including Foxp3 1 , Tr1, Th3, and Foxp3neg iT(R)35 cells. In this study, we identified a new subset of CD4 1 VEGFR1 high Tregs that have immunosuppressive capacity. CD4 1 VEGFR1high T cells, which constitute approximately 1.0% of CD4 1 T cells, are hyporesponsive to T-cell antigen receptor stimulation. Surface marker and FoxP3 expression analysis revealed that CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells are distinct from known Tregs. CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells suppressed the proliferation of CD4 1 CD25 2 T cell as efficiently as CD4 1 CD25 high natural Tregs in a contact-independent manner. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of CD4 1 VEGFR1 1 T cells from wild type to RAG-2-deficient C57BL/6 mice inhibited effector T-cell-mediated inflammatory bowel disease. Thus, we report CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells as a novel subset of Tregs that regulate the inflammatory response in the intestinal tract.
“…24 In mouse model of chronic infusion of VEGF, VEGFR2 signaling significantly inhibited thymic T-cell development and decreased total number of splenic T cells, whereas VEGFR1 signaling contributed to the mobilization of T cells such as T precursors from the bone marrow and T cells from thymus to spleen. 38 Furthermore, the treatment of neutralizing anti-VEGFR1 Ab and exogenous VEGF did not affect the suppressive function of CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cell. However, VEGFR1 would be involved in the migration of these cells and cause cleavage of IL-2 receptor a (CD25) from the surface of activated T cells through the induction of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) under a certain environment such as VEGF or a ligand-enriched environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VEGF and VEGFR have profound effects on both developmental hematopoiesis and pathologic conditions. [32][33][34][35][36][37][38] We first investigated the expression level of VEGFR1 in the murine thymocytes and T cells. We observed DN, DP, and SP (CD4 and CD8) thymocytes expressed VEGFR1.…”
Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a specialized subpopulation of T cells that control the immune response and thereby maintain immune system homeostasis and tolerance to self-antigens. Many subsets of CD4 1 Tregs have been identified, including Foxp3 1 , Tr1, Th3, and Foxp3neg iT(R)35 cells. In this study, we identified a new subset of CD4 1 VEGFR1 high Tregs that have immunosuppressive capacity. CD4 1 VEGFR1high T cells, which constitute approximately 1.0% of CD4 1 T cells, are hyporesponsive to T-cell antigen receptor stimulation. Surface marker and FoxP3 expression analysis revealed that CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells are distinct from known Tregs. CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells suppressed the proliferation of CD4 1 CD25 2 T cell as efficiently as CD4 1 CD25 high natural Tregs in a contact-independent manner. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of CD4 1 VEGFR1 1 T cells from wild type to RAG-2-deficient C57BL/6 mice inhibited effector T-cell-mediated inflammatory bowel disease. Thus, we report CD4 1 VEGFR1 high T cells as a novel subset of Tregs that regulate the inflammatory response in the intestinal tract.
“…5B). To validate this finding further, we treated F1 isografts of spontaneous MMTV-PyVT breast cancer with IgG or DC101 at different doses (10,20, and 40 mg/kg). Only quarter-dose DC101 treatment significantly increased tumorinfiltrating CD4 + and CD8 + T cells (Fig.…”
“…Proangiogenic factors not only suppress the function of various immune cells (10) but also diminish leukocyte-endothelial interactions and hinder the infiltration of immune effector cells into the tumor parenchyma (11). Clinical studies consistently support the view that malignant tumors are nonpermissive to T effector cell accumulation (3,7,12).…”
The recent approval of a prostate cancer vaccine has renewed hope for anticancer immunotherapies. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may limit the effectiveness of current immunotherapies. Antiangiogenic agents have the potential to modulate the tumor microenvironment and improve immunotherapy, but they often are used at high doses in the clinic to prune tumor vessels and paradoxically may compromise various therapies. Here, we demonstrate that targeting tumor vasculature with lower vascular-normalizing doses, but not high antivascular/antiangiogenic doses, of an anti-VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) antibody results in a more homogeneous distribution of functional tumor vessels. Furthermore, lower doses are superior to the high doses in polarizing tumor-associated macrophages from an immune inhibitory M2-like phenotype toward an immune stimulatory M1-like phenotype and in facilitating CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell tumor infiltration. Based on this mechanism, scheduling lower-dose anti-VEGFR2 therapy with T-cell activation induced by a whole cancer cell vaccine therapy enhanced anticancer efficacy in a CD8 + T-cell-dependent manner in both immune-tolerant and immunogenic murine breast cancer models. These findings indicate that vascular-normalizing lower doses of anti-VEGFR2 antibody can reprogram the tumor microenvironment away from immunosuppression toward potentiation of cancer vaccine therapies. Given that the combinations of high doses of bevacizumab with chemotherapy have not improved overall survival of breast cancer patients, our study suggests a strategy to use antiangiogenic agents in breast cancer more effectively with active immunotherapy and potentially other anticancer therapies.
“…3,8,12 It has been suggested that different tumor-derived factors, such as granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), IL-1â€, and prostaglandins, can mobilize MDSC recruitment from bone marrow hematopoietic precursors and induce the immunosuppressive phenotype. [13][14][15][16][17][18] While this immunosuppressive phenotype is a trademark of MDSCs, there is no clear consensus on their suppressive mechanism. Nevertheless, the L-arginine metabolism often seems to play a central role in the immune-suppressive activity of MDSCs.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citationsâcitations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.